- From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 09:10:10 -0500 (EST)
- To: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
- cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
I am satisfied with the decision taken by the WG - Asir On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Alex Milowski wrote: > Dear Asir Vedamuthu, > > The W3C XML Schema Working Group has spent the last several weeks > working through the comments received from the public on the > Candidate Recommendation (CR) of the XML Schema specification. We > thank you for the comments you made on our specification during > our CR comment period, and want to make sure you know that all > comments received during the CR comment period have been recorded > in our CR issues list (http://www.w3.org/2000/12/xmlschema-crcomments.html). > > You raised the point registered as issue CR-36: > > Title: repeated-facets: Clarify meaning and processing of repeated facets? > > Description: > > Should Datatypes be modified to specify explicitly whether multiple > occurrences of facets (length, minLength, maxLength, whiteSpace, > maxInclusive, minInclusive, maxExclusive, minExclusive, precision, scale, > encoding, duration, and period) should be an error or not? If it is not an > error, which facet specification in the schema document should be followed? > > * the first one? > * the last one? > * the most restrictive? > * the least restrictive one? > * some other rule? > > Proposed Resolution: > > Chairs propose (1) to clarify that repeated facets are an error if not > authorized in the spec, and (2) to ensure that facets occurring at multiple > points in a derivation (e.g. patterns) can be combined successfully in a > single component at the abstract level (need ANDing of patterns). > > Actual Resolution: > > At its January 2001 meeting in London, the WG voted to open this as an > outstanding issue, and (after brief discussion) to resolve it as proposed > by the chairs. > > > It would be helpful to us to know whether you are satisfied with the > decision taken by the WG on this issue, or wish your dissent from the > WG's decision to be recorded for consideration by the Director of > the W3C. > > Regards, > > Alex Milowski > XML Schema Working Group > > >
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2001 09:11:16 UTC