- From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 08:35:26 -0000
- To: "Asir S Vedamuthu" <asirv@webmethods.com>
- Cc: "XML Schema Comments" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Dear Asir The W3C XML Schema Working Group has spent the last several weeks working through the comments received from the public on the Candidate Recommendation (CR) of the XML Schema specification. We thank you for the comments you made on our specification during our CR comment period, and want to make sure you know that all comments received during the CR comment period have been recorded in our CR issues list (http://www.w3.org/2000/12/xmlschema-crcomments.html). Among other issues, you raised the point registered as issue CR-21: Drop use of xsi:type as determinant for unions? The Schema Working Group declined to adopt the proposal on the grounds that the functionality is useful and is also well-defined. However I would note that the Working Group did vote to change the Type derivation OK [Simple]" constraint to read "Type allowed [Simple]" on the grounds that the members of a union type are, as you pointed out, not derived from it. It would be helpful to us to know whether you are satisfied with the decision taken by the WG on this issue, or wish your dissent from the WG's decision to be recorded for consideration by the Director of the W3C. Regards Martin Gudgin XML Schema Working Group
Received on Monday, 22 January 2001 03:36:23 UTC