RE: [Fwd: XML Schema Part 2 should provide BNF for all primitive types.] from David E. Cleary on 2001-03-27 (www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from January to March 2001)

From: David E. Cleary <davec@progress.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:13:01 -0500
To: "Asir S Vedamuthu" <asirv@webMethods.com>, <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, "Ashok Malhotra" <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Cc: <jjc@jclark.com>, <w3c-xml-schema-ig@w3.org>, <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NDBBIOBPAGDGFJAHFCGGIEGGCGAA.davec@progress.com>

> The big question is how long would it take to produce this? May be we can
> give up Part 2 re-org.

I would put BNF or RegEx above the reorg priority wise. Also, I do not see
why we could not add the to the Recommendation. We aren't making any changes
at all. I would also be happy to have this non-normative for 1.0.

David Cleary
Progress Software

Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2001 15:14:15 UTC