- From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 08:34:38 -0000
- To: <muraw3c@attglobal.net>
- Cc: "XML Schema Comments" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@gate.sinica.edu.tw>
Dear Murata-san, The W3C XML Schema Working Group has spent the last several weeks working through the comments received from the public on the Candidate Recommendation (CR) of the XML Schema specification. We thank you for the comments you made on our specification during our CR comment period, and want to make sure you know that all comments received during the CR comment period have been recorded in our CR issues list (http://www.w3.org/2000/12/xmlschema-crcomments.html). Among other issues, you raised the point registered as issue CR-56: Specify text/xml or application/xml After some discussion the Schema Working Group decided to remain agnostic about the mime type for XML Schema documents and say in the spec that processors must accept text/xml and application/xml but may also accept other mime types ( such as text/plain for example ) It would be helpful to us to know whether you are satisfied with the decision taken by the WG on this issue, or wish your dissent from the WG's decision to be recorded for consideration by the Director of the W3C. Regards Martin Gudgin XML Schema Working Group
Received on Monday, 22 January 2001 03:35:33 UTC