- From: Helena Cavanagh <helena.cavanagh@usa.net>
- Date: Thu Jan 18 13:39:41 2001
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Dear editors, I am reading the specification for Simple Type Definition Schema Components and am confused by some inconsistencies between Part 1 and Part 2 of the XML Schema specification. -------------------------------- LISTS Part 1 - Section 5.12 "If the {variety} is list: The {_item type_ definition} must have a {variety} of atomic or _UNION_ " Part 2 - Section 5.1.2 Derivation by List "A list datatype must be derived from an atomic or a _LIST_ datatype, known as the _itemType_ of the list datatype." -------------------------------- UNIONS Part 1 - Section 5.12 "If the {variety} is union: The {item type definition}[*] must have {variety} of _atomic or list_" Part 2 - Section 5.1.3 Derivation by Union "A union datatype can be derived from two or more _atomic, list or other UNION_ datatypes, known as the _memberTypes_ of that union datatype." Is UNION missing in Part 1? [*] should be {member type definitions} -------------------------------- Thank you very much, Helena Cavanagh ____________________________________________________________________ Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
Received on Thursday, 18 January 2001 13:39:41 UTC