- From: Jim Trezzo <jim.trezzo@oracle.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:49:39 -0800
- To: andyclar@us.ibm.com
- CC: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org, "Trezzo,Jim" <JTREZZO@US.ORACLE.COM>
Dear Andy Clark, The W3C XML Schema Working Group has spent the last several weeks working through the comments received from the public on the Candidate Recommendation (CR) of the XML Schema specification. We thank you for the comments you made on our specification during our CR comment period, and want to make sure you know that all comments received during the CR comment period have been recorded in our CR issues list: (http://www.w3.org/2000/12/xmlschema-crcomments.html). You raised the point registered as issue CR-49: XPath subset: Use subset not full XPath for Key and KeyRef The Schema Working Group has decided to use a subset of the XPath language for determining the scope of uniqueness for Keys as you suggested. After much discussion of the subset to use the Workgroup determined one that is different that the one you suggested. This subset will be reviewed by a joint task force of the XSL and XML Schema Working Groups. This subset will be formally drafted into the XML Schema recomendation documents by the editors. To give you an idea of what the subset is, this description (informal) should suffice until the next set of documents is available: --------------------------------------- XPath Sub Set axes node-tests predicates Multi-field keys In all the following examples x and y are to be interpreted as qualified or unqualified names Allow only the following possibilities for field; . - value of selector x - value of child of selector @x - value of attribute of selector x/y - x/y/@ - x//y - x//y/@ - ancestor::x/@ - Allow only the following possibilities for selector with respect to the current context; x - element child x/y - element grandchild of element child ( note only 1 level ) .//x - element descendant * - wildcard element as x in any of the above [y] - allowed to qualify any of the above whole path ( must appear at far right end ) [@y] - allowed to qualify any of the above whole path ( must appear at far right end ) | - disjunction of any of the above whole paths Only the above forms of XPath are allowed, we do *not* allow the verbose form. The above imposes no great burden on implementors as only child, descendant and attribute axes are allowed no reverse axes, no sibling axes. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- It would be helpful to us to know whether you are satisfied with the decision taken by the WG on this issue, or wish your dissent from the WG's decision to be recorded for consideration by the Director of the W3C. Regards Jim Trezzo XML Schema Working Group
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2001 12:50:04 UTC