- From: K.Kawaguchi <k-kawa@bigfoot.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:26:50 -0800
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
In section 2.4.2.6 of the part 2, the spec says > for string the value of whiteSpace is preserve; for any type derived by > restriction from string the value of whiteSpace can be any of the three > legal values I wonder if whiteSpace facet specified in the base type may affect the derived type. For example, <simpleType name="base"> <restriction base="string"> <enumeration value=" foo " /> </restriction> </simpleType> <simpleType name="derived"> <restriction base="base"> <whiteSpace value="collapse" /> </restriction> </simpleType> Default whiteSpace processing is "preserve" for string type, so * value space of "base" type " foo " " lexical space of "base" type " foo " Is this correct? Now, if the above assumption is correct, (1) What is the value space of "derived" type? Is it " foo "? Or "foo"? And, although the spec says in section 5.1.1 > One datatype can be derived from another datatype by restricting its > value space and, consequently, its lexical space. I found that sometimes derivation by restriction can "expand" lexical space, rather than restricting. Consider the following example <simpleType name="base"> <restriction base="string"> <enumeration value="foo" /> </restriction> </simpleType> <simpleType name="derived"> <restriction base="base"> <whiteSpace value="collapse" /> </restriction> </simpleType> " foo " is accepted as a "derived" type, whereas it's not accepted as a "base" type. regards, ---------------------- K.Kawaguchi E-Mail: k-kawa@bigfoot.com
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2001 20:27:05 UTC