- From: Aki Yoshida <akitoshi.yoshida@sap.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 12:50:25 +0100
- To: curt.arnold@hyprotech.com
- Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Dear Curt, The W3C XML Schema Working Group has spent the last several weeks working through the comments received from the public on the Candidate Recommendation (CR) of the XML Schema specification. We thank you for the comments you made on our specification during our CR comment period, and want to make sure you know that all comments received during the CR comment period have been recorded in our CR issues list (http://www.w3.org/2000/12/xmlschema-crcomments.html). You raised the point registered as issue CR-37: Title: Change the namespace defaults in DTD for Schemas? In particular, you suggested 1) set the parameter entities 'p' and 's' to 'xsd:' and ':xsd', respectively, so that without redefining them in an internal subset, a schema using this prefix can be validated against this DTD. 2) add some namespace declarations in the schema element as placeholders so that a schema can use these attributes (ns declarations) without redefining PE schemaAttrs. Resolution: The Working Group agreed to classify this issue as an editorial question and not to make changes. It is certainly convenient to have a prefix, but it is not clear if making this prefix to have default value 'xsd' will bring any significant benefits. For those schemas that happen to use this xsd prefix will benefit, but for others, one still needs to redefine it in an internal subset. Similarly, adding some placeholders for namespace declarations may be convenient for some schemas, but it is not clear what proportion of schemas will benefit with such arbitrarily chosen placeholders. It is important to note that the DTD for Schema already provides a mechanism to let the schema author redefine this namespace prefix and also add necessary namespace declarations using an internal subset. The Working Group considers this solution to be general and adequate for most schema authors. It would be helpful to us to know whether you are satisfied with the decision taken by the WG on this issue, or wish your dissent from the WG's decision to be recorded for consideration by the Director of the W3C. Regards Aki Yoshida XML Schema Working Group
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2001 06:56:26 UTC