- From: Fuchs, Matthew <matthew.fuchs@commerceone.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:30:07 -0800
- To: "'Michael Fitzgerald'" <mike@wyeast.net>, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Michael, Thank you for picking up on this. SOX-1.1 was an interim version of SOX which was neither submitted to the W3C nor fully implemented by Commerce One. I do not know if there is a publicly available URI for it at this time. However, XSDL in its final form is far more dependent on our SOX-2 submission at [1] than than the 1.1 version (although I believe it was 1.1 that introduced first class attribute and model groups as found in XSDL). Therefore this should really be replaced with: "SOX-2 Schema for Object-oriented XML 2.0, Andrew Davidson et al., W3C 1999 See http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-SOX/" Matthew [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-SOX/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Fitzgerald [mailto:mike@wyeast.net] > Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 9:45 AM > To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > Subject: SOX reference > > > I know this is past the 15 Dec. 2000 deadline, but I offer the comment > nevertheless. > > In the references section you have: > > "SOX-1.1 Schema for Object-oriented XML, Version 1.1, Matt > Fuchs, et al. > W3C, 1999. See ???" > > I don't imagine the question marks will remain in the final > draft. Does XML > Schema reference SOX 1.1 specifically? If not, perhaps, if > you do not drop > the reference, you may want to link to the most recent (v3.0) SOX > specification, available at http://www.xcbl.org/xcbl30/xcbl30sox.html. > > I am not affiliated with Commerce One in any way. > > Best of luck as you complete XML Schema. > > Mike > ===== > Wy'east Communications http://wyeast.net mailto:mike@wyeast.net >
Received on Monday, 29 January 2001 14:30:56 UTC