- From: <muraw3c@attglobal.net>
- Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 01:19:43 +0900 (JST)
- To: cmsmcq@acm.org
- Cc: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk, marting@develop.com, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org, connolly@w3.org, ricko@gate.sinica.edu.tw
Dear Michael, Michael wrote: > I wrote: > > They should be served as application/xml. (If this sentence is > > added, I will withdraw my request to the W3C director. > > I think this should be acceptable to the XML Schema WG. Personally, > I would prefer that the XML Schema spec be as agnostic as possible on > this issue, and so I would prefer a statement other than a bald > > XML Schema documents should be served as MIME type aplication/xml. Your preference is understood and agreed. > Perhaps a better alternative would be something like this? > > [RFC 3023] recommends that XML-encoded material should be served as > MIME type application/xml, unless the XML source code is readable by > casual users (in which case it should be served as text/xml). Many > observers believe that XML Schema documents fall into this category > and should therefore be served as application/xml. I think that this would be perfect. I withdraw my opposition to the disposition of this issue. Cheers, IBM Tokyo Research Lab & International University of Japan, Research Institute MURATA Makoto
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2001 11:19:45 UTC