RE: xmlschema-formal: Inference rules

And I thank all of you for the work you've all put into this document.  I'm
just trying to understand this difficult topic, and it really helps to read
carefully.  So carefully in fact that I can't help but notice some typos
that are otherwise easily missed.  :)

-Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fuchs, Matthew [mailto:matthew.fuchs@commerceone.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 3:37 PM
> To: 'rwaldin@cacheon.com'; www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
> Subject: RE: xmlschema-formal: Inference rules
>
>
> Ray,
>
> On behalf of the editors, I'd like to thank you for the
> careful reading
> you're giving us.
>
> Matthew
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ray S. Waldin [mailto:rwaldin@cacheon.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 3:24 PM
> > To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
> > Subject: xmlschema-formal: Inference rules
> >
> >
> > Section 3.8 Inference Rules show the following example:
> >
> > 		d1 in g1       d2 in g2
> > 	-------------------------------------
> > 			d1 ,d2 in g1
> >
> > The judgement below the line seems to be missing ",g2"
> > following "g1".
> >
> > -Ray
> >

Received on Friday, 23 March 2001 04:48:07 UTC