- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 22 Jan 2001 09:46:30 +0000
- To: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Cc: XML Schema Comments <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> writes:
> I'm probably missing something obvious, but why are identity constraint
> definitions required to have a name? It seems to be used only to allow
> key and unique constraints to be referenced by keyref constraints. In
> other cases, it seems to do nothing but obfuscate the schema (at least
> it confused me).
So you're suggesting the name should be optional?
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Monday, 22 January 2001 04:46:32 UTC