belated regrets: telecon 7/31
Overview document now contains references section
regrets, maybe.
CR request is submitted
sameIndividualAs
regrets for two telecons
Overview doesn't cite use cases and requirements
TEST: sameAs I4.6-001 and I4.6-002 obsoleted
Proposed response to Dave Reynolds on dataranges
- Re: Proposed response to Dave Reynolds on dataranges
- Re: Proposed response to Dave Reynolds on dataranges
Tests illustrating structure sharing
Re: review of wine.owl and food.owl (attn Sandro, Dan, Jos)
draft minutes from July 24 telecon
review of wine.owl and food.owl
- Re: review of wine.owl and food.owl
- Re: review of wine.owl and food.owl
- RE: review of wine.owl and food.owl
- RE: review of wine.owl and food.owl
- RE: review of wine.owl and food.owl
Test ontologies
Withdrawing HP's objection to OWL DL Syntax
Humo(u)r -- OWL Acronyms
thanks to all
Minutes fix
review of S&AS and 5.3
IMPORTANT Agenda Amendments
regrets today
Re: no explicit type on bnodes
Re: ADMIN: VOTING DETAILS FOR CR DECISION [Proxy]
Potential Regrets for Today's Telecon
I vote for moving to CR (was: RE: ADMIN: VOTING DETAILS FOR CR DECISION)
Outstanding comments
IMPORTANT - ADMIN: DETAILS FOR JULY 23 TELECON (and my regrets)
ADMIN: VOTING DETAILS FOR CR DECISION
Regrets August 7
Dave Reynold's comment - dataranges
Dave Reynold's message - bNodes as object in multiple triples
my review of the July 15 draft of RDF Semantics
new version of S&AS in response to changes to RDF model theory
TEST: 7 of 7: unionOf and the Patel-Schneider paradox
- Re: TEST: 7 of 7: unionOf and the Patel-Schneider paradox
- Re: TEST: 7 of 7: unionOf and the Patel-Schneider paradox
TEST: 6 of 7: empty universe example,
- Re: TEST: 6 of 7: empty universe example,
- Re: TEST: 6 of 7: empty universe example,
- Re: TEST: 6 of 7: empty universe example,
- Re: TEST: 6 of 7: empty universe example,
TEST: 5 of 7: was Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint
TEST: 4 of 7: was: Need a test -- inverse and oneOf
TEST: 3 of 7 : RDFS changed semantics of rdfs:subClassOf
TEST: 2 of 7 : issue 5.3
TEST: 1 of 7 : document updated - intro
Re: RDFCore Comments on OWL Reference
Re: issues with respect to the test cases overall manifest document
- Re: issues with respect to the test cases overall manifest document
- Re: issues with respect to the test cases overall manifest document
[Fwd: Question on OWL Lite]
Unanswered comment?
Agenda and Logistics July 24 telecon -- CR vote expected
- Re: Agenda and Logistics July 24 telecon -- CR vote expected
- Re: Agenda and Logistics July 24 telecon -- CR vote expected
Proposal to request Candidate Recommendation
- Re: Proposal to request Candidate Recommendation
- Re: Proposal to request Candidate Recommendation
- Re: Proposal to request Candidate Recommendation
WOWG - New version of CR request
Re: Minutes of the beer session
owl:Thing and owl:Nothing
modified action
Deborah L. McGuiness in Guide?
issue list sick?
Modeling issues and guidelines?
Re: "ObjectProperty" and "DatatypeProperty"
PR/CR Page
All messages answered
Proposed response to Dave Reynolds - questions from HP
- Re: Proposed response to Dave Reynolds - questions from HP
TEST: update of testresults
New WG member - introduction
helping folks read the OWL schema
WOWG: Move to CR/PR - heads up and press release?
Proposed response to Ken Laskey
Answering Ken Laskey (incl. proposal w/respect to AllDisjoint)
Proposed response to Gary Ng http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jul/0014.html
belated regrets: telecon of 7/17/03
More OWL test passers
new reply to comments by Bijan Parsia
Update of spread sheet
A couple more comments
ADMIN: Status of Comments - 7/15
ADMIN; REMINDER - NO TELECON THIS WEEK
regerets until Aug 4
Need someone to answer new comment
Proposed response on daml:item
pls elaborate citations in OWL Overview
regrets 24 July due to TAG ftf
Revisiting AllDisjoint (was Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG)
- Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint (was Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG)
- Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint (was Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG)
- Revisiting structured datatypes was: Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint (was Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG)
- Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint (was Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG)
- Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint (was Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG)
- Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint (was Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG)
Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG
- Re: Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG
- Re: Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG
- Re: Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG
Proposed response to: Unspecified domain,range in App. C of OWL Language Reference
Protege OWL plugin
WOWG: We need your results on the Tests
- Re: WOWG: We need your results on the Tests
- Re: WOWG: We need your results on the Tests
- Re: WOWG: We need your results on the Tests
- Re: WOWG: We need your results on the Tests
- Re: WOWG: We need your results on the Tests
Fwd: FYI: homepage for editors
RDFCore changed rdfs:subClassOf from iff to if
Link to Editor's Draft of Use Cases and Requirements
regrest for 7/10/2003
regrets today
WOWG: agenda Jul 10 telecon (revised)
- regrets for 3 weeks
- WOWG: minutes Jul 10 telecon
- Re: WOWG: agenda Jul 10 telecon (revised)
Regrets
examples entailment questions
- Re: examples entailment questions
- Re: examples entailment questions
- Re: examples entailment questions
WOWG: agenda Jul 10 telecon (provisional)
list archive updates on hold
Jonathan Borden response to 'Next step for OWL - are we ready to move to Candidate and/or Proposed Recommendation'
Regrets, 10th July Telecon
Update on closed issue status
WOWG: WEB-BASED STRAWPOLL on next steps - have your "vote" count
CALL FOR PAPERS: Workshop on Regulatory Ontologies..
XSD datatypes anchor
ill-formed lists in OWL Full
Regrets 10th July
OWL guide problem?
distinctMembers in OWL Full undefined.
Jos De Roo response to 'Next step for OWL - are we ready to move to Candidate and/or Proposed Recommendation'
daml:item - still confused
- Re: daml:item - still confused
- Re: daml:item - still confused
- Re: daml:item - still confused
- Re: daml:item - still confused
- Re: daml:item - still confused
Proposed response to Bob MacGregor on Keys
patrick hayes response to 'Next step for OWL - are we ready to move to Candidate and/or Proposed Recommendation'
Jeremy Carroll response to 'Next step for OWL - are we ready to move to Candidate and/or Proposed Recommendation'
Jos De Roo response to 'Next step for OWL - are we ready to move to Candidate and/or Proposed Recommendation'
Telecon Regrets
Proposed Test: oneof/inverse
Proposal to Close issue 5.3, Semantic Layering
Test approvals
RE: Layering bug?
Re: Layering bug?
RE: Layering bug
Mike Dean response to 'Next step for OWL - are we ready to move to Candidate and/or Proposed Recommendation'
Re: update on I18N review of RDF, OWL
Re: Layering bug
Draft response to Bernard Vatant
2 CfP: KCAP 03 Markup and Annotation Workshop
small error in S&AS
ISSUE 5.3, a non-mon example
Fwd: RDF XMLLiterals reagle-01,-02
Agenda/Logistics for July 3 telecon
- Re: Agenda/Logistics for July 3 telecon
- Proposed QA Reply (version 2)
- Re: Agenda/Logistics for July 3 telecon
- Re: Agenda/Logistics for July 3 telecon
- Re: Agenda/Logistics for July 3 telecon
- Re: Agenda/Logistics for July 3 telecon
Fwd: Announcement: New Process Document Operative
regrets: 7/3 telecon
ISSUE 5.3 some of the HP discussions
Review of QA test guidelines
probable regrets telecon 3 July
Re: specifying minimal datatypes without reference to "OWL Tools"
- Re: specifying minimal datatypes without reference to "OWL Tools"
- Re: specifying minimal datatypes without reference to "OWL Tools"
- Re: specifying minimal datatypes without reference to "OWL Tools"