- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 16 Jul 2003 15:23:49 -0500
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 15:01, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > Here is my proposed reply to Bijan. This seems responsive and consistent with WG proceedings. Pleasedo send it. [...] > > ***** > > IMPLEMENTORS' NOTE: OWL Lite and OWL DL closely correspond to the > > description logics known as SHIF(D) and SHION(D), with some limitation > > on how datatypes are treated. The abstract syntax for OWL Lite doesn't > > contain many of the common explicit constructors associated with > > SHIF(D), but the expressivity remains. > > ***** > > > > > If you have a suggestion for a suitable > > > place to stick this information, let us know. (If the wording fits > > > nicely > > > in S&AS, it might even make it in there.) > > > > I actually can't think of a better place to put it. > > This has been added as a Note just before Section 2.1. To see the change > look in > http://www-db.research.bell-labs.com/user/pfps/owl/semantics/ [...] -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2003 16:23:51 UTC