Re: new reply to comments by Bijan Parsia

On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 15:01, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> Here is my proposed reply to Bijan.

This seems responsive and consistent with WG proceedings.
Pleasedo  send it.

[...]
> > *****
> > IMPLEMENTORS' NOTE: OWL Lite and OWL DL closely correspond to the 
> > description logics known as SHIF(D) and SHION(D), with some limitation 
> > on how datatypes are treated. The abstract syntax for  OWL Lite doesn't 
> > contain many of the common explicit constructors associated with 
> > SHIF(D), but the expressivity remains.
> > *****
> >
> > > If you have a suggestion for a suitable
> > > place to stick this information, let us know.  (If the wording fits 
> > > nicely
> > > in S&AS, it might even make it in there.)
> > 
> > I actually can't think of a better place to put it.
> 
> This has been added as a Note just before Section 2.1.  To see the change
> look in 
> 	http://www-db.research.bell-labs.com/user/pfps/owl/semantics/
[...]

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2003 16:23:51 UTC