- From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 16:06:12 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
>Hmm... I gather Peter is travelling. > >Meanwhile, I'd be interested to know if anybody >else agrees or disagrees that this is an improvement... I agree it is, and also find the "OWL tool" reference jarring. Pat > >On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 09:37, Dan Connolly wrote: >> Prompted by Martin's I18N questions, I found... >> >> "OWL tools need only implement the datatypes xsd:integer and >> xsd:string." >> -- >> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/syntax.html#owl_built_in_datatypes >> >> What's an "OWL tool"? Let's specify the language >> without reference to software. >> >> In 3.1. Vocabularies and Interpretations, >> please change the defintion of datatype theory >> and/or Abstract OWL interpretation so that >> integer and string have to be included in the >> set of datatypes for every Abstract OWL interpretation. >> >> And change OWL interpretation in 5.2. OWL Interpretations >> likewise. >> >> Then strike the "OWL tools..." bit in >> section 2. Abstract Syntax. > >-- >Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2003 17:06:16 UTC