- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 09:02:25 +0300
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
The comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0083 was partially answered ... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jun/0022 which said [[ > **Comment 2** > + *A* seems unnecessarily complex > Do these constraints on owl:disjointWith have to be as complicated as > they are? In the current situation the constraints on owl:disjointWith are required. There is a proposal to modify the situation, but it depends on some work that is needed to determine if the modification is feasible. When the final determination as to whether to make this modification is made, we will respond futher. ]] no further response has been sent. This thread is not reflected in the disposition of comments http://www.cs.umd.edu/~hendler/2003/OWLClosed.htm http://owl.mindswap.org/2003/arbitrary/class.shtml?class=http%3A%2F%2Fowl.mindswap.org%2F2003%2Font%2Fowlweb.rdf%23owlComment (as far as I can tell) Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 03:02:49 UTC