- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 30 Jul 2003 13:28:57 -0500
- To: ewallace@cme.nist.gov
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 10:32, ewallace@cme.nist.gov wrote: > Dan Connolly wrote: > >Sandro told me about a more recent > >editors draft... > >http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/webont/OWLOverview.htm > > > >It cites OWL tests, but not OWL Requirements. > > > >I'm not sure whether it's reasonable to request CR > >without fixing this. > > I found a reference to "OWL Use Cases and Requirements" in the > "Why OWL?" section > <http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/webont/OWLOverview.htm#s1.2> > of the current editors draft. Ah! Good catch; I hadn't seen that. Thanks. > Regarding full citations: Personally, I don't think we should > hold up the CR request for a lack of a References section in Overview. > OWL Reference has one and the Overview editors may believe this is > sufficient. I'd still like to get it fixed eventually, but I don't think I'll wait for it at this point. > -Evan > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ office: tel:+1-617-395-0241 (new VoIP phone Mar 2003) mobile: tel:+1-816-616-6576 mobile: mailto:connolly+pager@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2003 14:28:58 UTC