- From: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 20:55:55 +0100
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Cc: webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
On July 15, Jim Hendler writes: > > in [1], Gary Ng asks some questions -- we need someone to answer > (remember, this is on our public-webont-comments list, so we need to > answer via LC process). It doesn't directly address a document, > although it does mention Ref - but it also asks some stuff that was > in Jeremy's issues -- Jeremy, do you want to take a stab? Anyone > else? I didn't realise that we were still in LC mode so I already answered it directly. Hopefully I didn't say anything too controversial. In case you missed it, my answer was: > Unknown or unrecognised datatypes are treated as being the lexical > form (a string) of some unknown datatype. It is obviously the case > that, whatever the datatype, identical lexical forms map to the same > element of the value space, and can thus be considered equal. For > non-identical lexical forms, however, it *cannot* be assumed that they > do not map to the same element of the value space and are thus > unequal. > > E.g., the lexical forms "1.0" and "01.00" would map to the same value > (and thus be considered equal) in some datatypes (e.g., decimal), but > not in others (e.g., string). Gary already asked a follow up question. This doesn't really seem to be a LC comment so much as a request for help from an implementor. Should I suggest that we move the discussion elsewhere (where?) and then answer his follow-up? Regards, Ian > thanks > JH > > > > -- > Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu > Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 > Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) > Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 *** 240-277-3388 (Cell) > http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler *** NOTE CHANGED CELL NUMBER ***
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2003 15:57:03 UTC