- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 01 Jul 2003 09:25:27 -0500
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Hmm... I gather Peter is travelling. Meanwhile, I'd be interested to know if anybody else agrees or disagrees that this is an improvement... On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 09:37, Dan Connolly wrote: > Prompted by Martin's I18N questions, I found... > > "OWL tools need only implement the datatypes xsd:integer and > xsd:string." > -- > http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/syntax.html#owl_built_in_datatypes > > What's an "OWL tool"? Let's specify the language > without reference to software. > > In 3.1. Vocabularies and Interpretations, > please change the defintion of datatype theory > and/or Abstract OWL interpretation so that > integer and string have to be included in the > set of datatypes for every Abstract OWL interpretation. > > And change OWL interpretation in 5.2. OWL Interpretations > likewise. > > Then strike the "OWL tools..." bit in > section 2. Abstract Syntax. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2003 10:25:31 UTC