Re: Agenda and Logistics July 24 telecon -- CR vote expected

and offlist:
[[
please let me/WG know if there is anything you think must be discussed and 
decided  PRIOR to the CR vote
]]

I suggest that there are three things that we should consider ...
The rationale for considering them prior to CR vote is that they reflect 
unresolved issues (not necessarily in the formal sense), that the WG is 
aware of.

A)
Response to RDF Core decision to remove rdf:type rdf:List triples.

   PROPOSAL 1:
      Change OWL DL Syntax to permit blank nodes without an explicit type, 
except for blank nodes corresponding to unnamed ontologies. (All current 
production of such triples to be made optional).

See [1] for proof of viability.

   PROPOSAL 2:
      Change OWL DL syntax to make the rdf:type rdf:List triples optional.



B)
The B.1 B.2 issue on restrictions on bnodes corresponding to descriptions.

   PROPOSAL:
     to accept the changes B.1 B.2 [2] currently excluded from the 
resolution  of OWL DL Syntax; permitting DAGs of such bnodes.

See [3] for proof of viability.


C)
Any LC comments for which:
- we have no ack accepting our comment
- and the commentor has not had seven/fourteen days to respond.
(the choice of time period should be driven by the process doc).
[I will ask Dave Reynolds to send a response to that last comment ASAP]


Jeremy

[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jun/0302

[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0066

[3]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jun/0017
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jun/0294

Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 03:32:10 UTC