ill-formed lists in OWL Full

• From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
• Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 19:23:45 +0300
• To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <200307041923.45665.jjc@hpl.hp.com>

I can't see any constraint in the editors draft of OWL Full semantics that 
forces rdf:first to be functional or rdf:rest to be functional even on the 
class of OWL Lists. OWL Lists are identified with I(rdf:LIst) which does not 
be default denote well-formed lists, but any structures at all really. 
Although optionally we can constrain the vocabulary in the obvious ways, I 
don't see this constraint being taken up.

I imagine that this is a bug.

Jeremy

Received on Friday, 4 July 2003 13:24:00 UTC