[moved] Re: Proposal to request Candidate Recommendation

At 7:30 PM +0300 7/23/03, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>>>We have already integrated some of the changes that RDF Core have told us
>>>about, and not others. Either we should go to CR with their last published
>>>WDs or we should go with all the decisions they have informed us about.
>>>The current state is unsatisfactory in that it presents an unnecessarily
>>>moving target for implementors.
>
>>But there is no way to resolve except for us to wait until they move
>>to PR, which would mean we sit around for a month doing nothing.
>
>I tend to agree that it is better to move to CR than sit around waiting for
>RDFCore to get to PR.
>
>A specific issue I had in mind was that of "_:x rdf:type rdf:List", which is
>still obligatory in S&AS (for OWL DL).
>The latest editors draft of Test has the interesting discrepancy that the
>triples are generated accordfing to the latest editors draft of RDF Syntax
>(without these type triples), and so many of the DL tests get flagged as in
>error - technically they are.
>
>Jeremy

Peter has addressed this in thread entitled "optional list typing" - 
thanks Peter.



-- 
Professor James Hendler				  hendler@cs.umd.edu
Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies	  301-405-2696
Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab.	  301-405-6707 (Fax)
Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742	  *** 240-277-3388 (Cell)
http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler      *** NOTE CHANGED CELL NUMBER ***

Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 14:01:43 UTC