- From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:46:02 +0200
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: "WebOnt" <www-webont-wg@w3.org>, "Eric Miller" <em@w3.org>
Dan > Let me see if I can put aside the part of me that is deep > into end-game mode, trying madly to cross things off the TODO list > of this group, and respond constructively to your offer to > help get this technology deployed... I appreciate the effort :) > I'm not inclined to extend the work of this group into review > of tutorial materials (beyond the OWL Guide WD). I understand. This could last forever. > Meanwhile, in the short term, there are at least these mechanisms > in place: > > - you can help answer questions that come up in www-rdf-logic > - you can write tutorial material and call for review (and/or > collaborators) in www-rdf-logic, www-rdf-interest, etc. e.g. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-logic/2003Mar/0190.html > > - you can collaborate on patterns of best practice and frequently > asked questions in the ESW Wiki; e.g. > http://esw.w3.org/topic/ThingsVersusTheirNames > not to mention > http://esw.w3.org/topic/TopicMaps > Beyond those existing mechansism and fora, > you're also welcome to discuss with Eric Miller, Semantic Web > Activity Lead, your interest in, for example, a W3C Interest Group on > best practices and such. Other folks have expressed interest; > e.g. at the Cambridge tech plenary last March: > > 13:30 - 15:00 First afternoon session > Best Practices / Education and Outreach - Eric Miller > * logs: 18:36:24 > * Kathy MacDougal, Sun's SWoRDFish > * Guus Schrieber, Some thoughts on SW Best Practices > * Liddy Neville, Additional thoughts > -- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/meetings/tech-200303/ OK. Thanks for the pointers and suggestions. I had forgotten ESW Wiki, shame on me. I'll look into all those. Bernard
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2003 04:46:21 UTC