- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 28 Jul 2003 11:17:06 -0500
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 12:50, Jim Hendler wrote: > Ian - this looks okay to me, send it. Oops; I guess I didn't review this quickly enough... I see it's already been sent. [...] > >> It was therefore decided oops! no pointer to decision record. > >> not to include them in the language at > >> present. It may be possible to add them in the future as and when a > >> thorough investigation of the issues proves that they would not have > >> any adverse effects. I guess I'll follow up and add a pointer to the decision record. I think the relevant issue is 5.7... hmm... http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#I5.7-Range-restrictions-should-not-be-separate-URIs the issues list isn't clear on why we postponed that; it seems to be missing details from Jim's message of 17Dec. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Dec/0196.html Hmm... did we sorta reopen 5.7 when we decided 5.8? I think some clean-up of the issues list is in order. I hope I can get to it presently. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 28 July 2003 12:17:08 UTC