- From: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:43:58 +0100
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Cc: webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Jim, There is a partial outstanding comment from Karl Dubost [1]. I wrote to him asking for clarification but didn't get a reply yet. I will ping him. Ian [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jul/0012.html From: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk> To: karl@w3.org CC: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> Subject: [closed] Re: QA Review of owl-semantics Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:41:46 +0100 Karl, If I understand, you would like us to add "(normative)" after the section heading of each normative section so that each section is clearly marked as "(normative)" or "(informative)" (as is already the case for informative sections). E.g., the heading of section 2 would become: 2. Abstract Syntax (normative) Is this correct? Regards, Ian
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2003 05:45:07 UTC