- From: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:43:58 +0100
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Cc: webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Jim,
There is a partial outstanding comment from Karl Dubost [1]. I wrote
to him asking for clarification but didn't get a reply yet. I will
ping him.
Ian
[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jul/0012.html
From: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: karl@w3.org
CC: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Subject: [closed] Re: QA Review of owl-semantics
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:41:46 +0100
Karl,
If I understand, you would like us to add "(normative)" after the
section heading of each normative section so that each section is
clearly marked as "(normative)" or "(informative)" (as is already
the case for informative sections). E.g., the heading of section 2
would become:
2. Abstract Syntax (normative)
Is this correct?
Regards,
Ian
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2003 05:45:07 UTC