www-webont-wg@w3.org from February 2003 by date

Saturday, 1 March 2003

• Re: TEST: harder DL tests (3 SAT) Jos De_Roo

Friday, 28 February 2003

• Re: TEST: rdf compatibility Jim Hendler
• Re: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST: datatypes and cardinality Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST: harder DL tests (3 SAT) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: TEST: harder DL tests (3 SAT) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST: datatypes and cardinality Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: TEST: harder DL tests (3 SAT) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: TEST: harder DL tests (3 SAT) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST: harder DL tests (3 SAT) Sean Bechhofer
• TEST: rdf compatibility Jeremy Carroll
• TEST, GUIDE: food.owl, wine.owl Jeremy Carroll
• TEST: datatypes and cardinality Jeremy Carroll
• TEST: harder DL tests (3 SAT) Jeremy Carroll
• TEST: owl:foobar Jeremy Carroll
• ADMIN: Minutes of February 27 telecon Jim Hendler

Thursday, 27 February 2003

• Re: Formally addressing issue: rdf compatibility Jim Hendler
• Belated Regrets for 27-Feb Jonathan Dale
• Re: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Datatypes: XSD notion of minimally conforming processors. Smith, Michael K
• Re: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches Jim Hendler
• Re: Guide: Question re annotations Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches Ian Horrocks
• RE: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches Sean Bechhofer
• RE: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches Ian Horrocks
• RE: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches Sean Bechhofer
• ADMIN: Abbreviated agenda for today, with agenda ammendments Jim Hendler
• February 27 Phonecon - Regrets, Stanton Stanton, John
• Re: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics February 27 Jeff Heflin
• RE: EDITORS IMPORTANT: Last Call Candidates Jeremy Carroll
• probable regrets: 2/27 telecon Leo Obrst
• RE: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches Jeremy Carroll
• Re: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches Sean Bechhofer
• Re: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics February 27 Jerome Euzenat
• Re: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches Jeremy Carroll
• Regrets: 27 Feb Telecon Sean Bechhofer
• ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics February 27 Jim Hendler

Wednesday, 26 February 2003

• Social meaning discussion 6th March Jeremy Carroll
• Issues: New issues list available Smith, Michael K
• Guide: Latest version Smith, Michael K
• Guide: Question re annotations Smith, Michael K
• Re: EDITORS IMPORTANT: Last Call Candidates Jeff Heflin
• Re: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches Jim Hendler
• Re: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches Jeremy Carroll
• syntax task force - differences between the two approaches Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL syntax task force Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: owl:complementOf in OWL Full Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: owl:complementOf in OWL Full Jos De_Roo
• Re: Regrets for the teleconference 20 Feb Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: owl:complementOf in OWL Full Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 25 February 2003

• owl:complementOf in OWL Full Jos De_Roo
• Re: OWL syntax Jeremy Carroll
• Re: OWL Syntax Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL Syntax Jeremy Carroll
• Re: OWL Syntax Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: 'annotation' in RDF/XML ? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• 'annotation' in RDF/XML ? Masahiro Hori
• Re: EDITORS IMPORTANT: Last Call Candidates Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Chairs' decisions about reopening some issues Jeremy Carroll
• Formally addressing issue: rdf compatibility Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Chairs' decisions about reopening some issues Jeremy Carroll
• regrets for thurs feb 27 and tues march 4 Deborah McGuinness
• Overview Last Call Candidate Document (was Re: EDITORS IMPORTANT: Last Call Candidates) Deborah McGuinness
• at risk/regrets this Thu Dan Connolly

Monday, 24 February 2003

• EDITORS IMPORTANT: Last Call Candidates Jim Hendler
• Chairs' decisions about reopening some issues Jim Hendler
• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March Lynn Andrea Stein
• Re: TEST: editor update Sean Bechhofer

Sunday, 23 February 2003

• Re: OWL syntax task force Deborah McGuinness
• ADMIN: Minutes of 2/20/03 Telecon Leo Obrst
• OWL syntax task force Guus Schreiber
• Re: AW: DAML -> OWL Converter generates OWL FULL only / OWL VALIDATOR Jim Hendler

Friday, 21 February 2003

• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March pat hayes
• Re: RDF Semantics review: RDFS interpretations Dan Connolly
• Re: RDF Semantics review: RDFS interpretations herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• RDF Semantics review mailed to rdf-comments herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Syntax links Jeremy Carroll
• Apology Jeremy Carroll
• AW: DAML -> OWL Converter generates OWL FULL only / OWL VALIDATOR Raphael Volz
• Re: owl tools Jim Hendler
• owl tools Deborah McGuinness

Thursday, 20 February 2003

• Re: AW: Syntax Changes (domain etc. in owl NS) Jim Hendler
• Review of RDF documents submitted Jim Hendler
• Re: DAML -> OWL Converter BROKEN Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE: Classes as instances [old] pat hayes
• Belated regrets for 20-Feb-03 Jonathan Dale
• Re: links to published documents Deborah McGuinness
• links to published documents Christopher Welty
• Regrets for the teleconference 20 Feb yasser.alsafadi@philips.com
• forthcoming book "Practical RDF" has chapter on OWL Tim Finin
• Regrets: WOWG: agenda Feb 20 telecon Thompson, Lynne R
• Re: implementation report issues for moving through CR Dan Connolly
• Regrets for Feb. 20 Jean-François BAGET
• Re: DAML -> OWL Converter BROKEN Jim Hendler
• implementation report issues for moving through CR Jim Hendler
• AW: Syntax Changes (domain etc. in owl NS) Raphael Volz
• DAML -> OWL Converter BROKEN Raphael Volz
• owl:Ontology and imports Sean Bechhofer
• Re: Syntax Changes (domain etc. in owl NS) Dan Connolly
• Re: Syntax Changes (AllDifferent etc.) Dan Connolly
• Syntax Changes Sean Bechhofer
• Re: WOWG: agenda Feb 20 telecon Jeff Heflin
• Re: Imports issue Jim Hendler
• Re: Proposed Consensus Review of RDF Core Documents herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• RDF Semantics review: further comments herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: Proposed Consensus Review of RDF Core Documents Jim Hendler
• Re: Proposed Consensus Review of RDF Core Documents Jim Hendler
• Re: Imports issue Ian Horrocks
• Re: Proposed Consensus Review of RDF Core Documents Jeremy Carroll
• Update: XML syntax document & Schema (draft for W3C Note) Masahiro Hori
• Re: Proposed Consensus Review of RDF Core Documents Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Imports issue Jeremy Carroll
• Proposed Consensus Review of RDF Core Documents Jim Hendler
• Re: Imports issue Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Imports issue Dickinson, Ian J
• Re: Imports issue Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Imports issue Sean Bechhofer
• Re: TEST: xmlliteral, ruby Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST: editor update Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Imports issue Sean Bechhofer
• Re: Imports issue Guus Schreiber
• Re: Imports issue Dan Connolly
• Re: Imports issue Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 19 February 2003

• Re: TEST: xmlliteral, ruby Jos De_Roo
• Re: SEM + TEST: editorial comment Jos De_Roo
• IImports issue Guus Schreiber
• Re: List of members for documents Jim Hendler
• Re: SEM + TEST: editorial comment Jeremy Carroll
• TEST: xmlliteral, ruby Jeremy Carroll
• Re: SEM + TEST: editorial comment Jos De_Roo
• Re: WOWG: agenda Feb 20 telecon Deborah McGuinness
• Re: Member list for documents Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: List of members for documents Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• TEST: annotations - also one query on S&AS Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST: extra credit - arithmetic Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• WOWG: agenda Feb 20 telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: ACTION: AnnotationPropert in owl.owl Jim Hendler
• Re: TEST: editor update Sean Bechhofer
• Re: TEST: editor update Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST: editor update Sean Bechhofer
• ACTION: AnnotationPropert in owl.owl Guus Schreiber
• Re: TEST: extra credit - arithmetic Dan Connolly
• Member list for documents Jim Hendler
• Re: OWL Syntax - complex restrictions Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST: extra credit - arithmetic Jeremy Carroll
• Re: OWL Syntax - complex restrictions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: SEM + TEST: editorial comment Jeremy Carroll
• Re: SEM + TEST: editorial comment Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: TEST: extra credit - arithmetic Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• SEM + TEST: editorial comment Guus Schreiber
• TEST: editor update Jeremy Carroll
• OWL Syntax - complex restrictions Jeremy Carroll
• TEST: extra credit - arithmetic Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 18 February 2003

• Review of Reference Document Jim Hendler
• List of members for documents Jim Hendler
• Review of Reference Document Jim Hendler

Monday, 17 February 2003

• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite Deborah McGuinness
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite Jim Hendler
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite Jim Hendler
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite Ian Horrocks
• Re: the relationships between OWL species Jim Hendler
• Social Meaning Discussion Jim Hendler
• Re: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports Jeremy Carroll
• Re: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• WOWG: Congrats to Ora Lassila Jim Hendler
• RE: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports Jeremy Carroll
• Re: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports Jeremy Carroll
• Re: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: the relationships between OWL species Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: the relationships between OWL species Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Social Meaning Boston 6 March Peter Crowther
• RE: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports Jeremy Carroll
• Re: the relationships between OWL species Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: a proposal for defining OWL DL documents Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports Sean Bechhofer
• RE: Social Meaning Boston 6 March Jeremy Carroll
• RE: the relationships between OWL species (was Re: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports) Jeremy Carroll
• RE: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports Jeremy Carroll
• Re: a proposal for defining OWL DL documents (was Re: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports) Dan Connolly

Sunday, 16 February 2003

• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite Jos De_Roo
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite Jim Hendler
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite Ian Horrocks
• Re: Streaming OWL Parsers Jeremy Carroll
• Re: DL and Lite namespaces? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• DL and Lite namespaces? Jim Hendler
• a proposal for defining OWL DL documents (was Re: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• the relationships between OWL species (was Re: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite Jonathan Borden

Saturday, 15 February 2003

• changes to semantics document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Streaming OWL Parsers Jos De_Roo
• RE: Streaming OWL Parsers Peter Crowther
• RE: Streaming OWL Parsers Jos De_Roo
• Re: owl:imports experience: took it out Jos De_Roo

Friday, 14 February 2003

• Re: owl:imports experience: took it out Jonathan Borden
• RE: Streaming OWL Parsers Dan Connolly
• Re: owl:imports experience: took it out Jos De_Roo
• RE: Streaming OWL Parsers Peter Crowther
• RE: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite Peter Crowther
• RE: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite Peter Crowther
• Re: owl:imports experience: took it out Jonathan Borden
• Re: Streaming OWL Parsers Jonathan Borden
• Re: owl:imports experience: took it out Jos De_Roo
• Re: Streaming OWL Parsers Dan Connolly
• Re: Streaming OWL Parsers Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests Sean Bechhofer
• OWL, XML-RDF and Imports Sean Bechhofer
• Streaming OWL Parsers Sean Bechhofer
• Re: owl:imports experience: took it out Jonathan Borden
• Re: owl:imports experience: took it out Jos De_Roo
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite Jonathan Borden
• Re: owl:imports experience: took it out Jonathan Borden

Thursday, 13 February 2003

• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite Evan Wallace
• cited message re. 'social meaning' debate pat hayes
• Re: XMLLiteral Dan Connolly
• Re: From our comments list (Lite/DL/Full) Dan Connolly
• Re: From our comments list pat hayes
• Social Meaning Boston 6 March Jeremy Carroll
• Social meaning link Jeremy Carroll
• XMLLiteral Jeremy Carroll
• Minutes from 2/13/2003 Telecon Jeff Heflin
• owl:imports experience: took it out Jos De_Roo
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite Deborah McGuinness
• RE: OWL Syntax (I18N) Dan Connolly
• Re: From our comments list Christopher Welty
• Re: RDF Semantics review: RDFS interpretations Dan Connolly
• Regrets: 13 Feb Telecon Masahiro Hori
• RE: OWL Syntax Jeremy Carroll
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite Ian Horrocks
• WOWG: agenda Feb 13 telecon (revised) Guus Schreiber
• Re: OWL Syntax Guus Schreiber
• RE: OWL Syntax Jeremy Carroll
• Re: OWL Syntax Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF Semantics review: RDFS interpretations herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: WOWG: Agenda Feb 13 telecon / partial regrets, RDF Semantics review herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests Sean Bechhofer
• RE: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests Jos De_Roo
• Review RDF: Concepts and Abstract Syntax (1rst part) Jerome Euzenat
• Re: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests Sean Bechhofer
• Re: OWL Syntax Jeremy Carroll
• Re: OWL Syntax Jeremy Carroll
• Re: OWL Syntax Jeremy Carroll
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports Jonathan Borden
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests Smith, Michael K
• RE: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests Smith, Michael K

Wednesday, 12 February 2003

• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports Jonathan Borden

Thursday, 13 February 2003

• Re: OWL Syntax Jos De_Roo

Wednesday, 12 February 2003

• Re: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests Jos De_Roo
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports Jonathan Borden
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite Jonathan Borden
• Re: OWL Syntax Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Annotations use case Ian Horrocks
• Re: OWL Syntax Evan Wallace
• Re: OWL Syntax Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests Dan Connolly
• Re: OWL Syntax Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests Jos De_Roo
• [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests Sean Bechhofer
• Re: WOWG: Agenda Feb 13 telecon Guus Schreiber
• From our comments list Jim Hendler
• WOWG: Agenda Feb 13 telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: OWL Syntax Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• FIRST EUROPEAN SUMMER SCHOOL ON ONTOLOGICAL ENGINEERING AND THE SEMANTIC WEB (SSSW-2003) Enrico Motta
• Re: RDF Semantics review: RDFS interpretations Dan Connolly
• WOWGL: telecon time Feb 13 Guus Schreiber
• OWL Syntax Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Annotations use case Jim Hendler
• Re: Annotations use case Jos De_Roo
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite Ian Horrocks
• Re: Annotations use case Ian Horrocks
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite Jonathan Borden
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports Jos De_Roo
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 11 February 2003

• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports Jos De_Roo
• Tech plenary Agenda posted Jim Hendler
• Re: AS & S Review: overview Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports pat hayes
• Re: Timeline Jim Hendler
• Re: AS & S Review: overview herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: Timeline herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: Timeline herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• WOWG: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite Jim Hendler

Monday, 10 February 2003

• Editors/authors Reference document Guus Schreiber
• proposals on annotations and imports Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Scribe Log of 2/6 telecon (posted for Raphael) Jim Hendler
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL datatype questions, with references Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Sunday, 9 February 2003

• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports Jos De_Roo
• OWL datatype questions, with references Leo Obrst
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports Jeremy Carroll
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports Jos De_Roo
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports Jos De_Roo
• Re: Annotations use case Ian Horrocks
• Re: Annotations use case Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE: annotations Ian Horrocks
• Re: Annotations use case Ian Horrocks

Saturday, 8 February 2003

• Re: RDF vocbulary compatibility Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE: annotations Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: AS & S Review: overview Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: AS & S Review: Appendix A.1: Correspondence between Abstract OWL and OWL DL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: AW: 'xsd:redefine' removed from XML presentation syntax Schemas Masahiro Hori
• Re: RDF vocbulary compatibility Jeremy Carroll
• Re: AS & S Review: Appendix A.1: Correspondence between Abstract OWL and OWL DL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports Jos De_Roo

Friday, 7 February 2003

• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports Jos De_Roo
• Re: RDF vocbulary compatibility Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• documents vs. sublanguages Mike Dean
• Re: ISSUE: XMLLiteral and xml:lang Jim Hendler
• Regrets for Feb 13 Jim Hendler
• WOWG: with respect to Chairs' decisions on proposed issues Jim Hendler
• Re: Annotations use case Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE: rdf compatibility Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE: XMLLiteral and xml:lang Jeremy Carroll
• XSLT transformation from OWL XML to OWL RDF Jerome Euzenat
• Re: ISSUE: XMLLiteral and xml:lang Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE: annotations Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Annotations use case Mike Dean
• Re: Annotations use case Mike Dean
• Re: typing nodes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE: rdf compatibility Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE: XMLLiteral and xml:lang Jeremy Carroll
• Proposal to open issues Jeremy Carroll
• ISSUE: rdf compatibility Jeremy Carroll
• Re: typing nodes Jeremy Carroll
• Annotations use case Jim Hendler
• typing nodes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Timeline Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Timeline Jim Hendler
• Re: Timeline Jim Hendler
• Re: RDF Semantics review: RDFS interpretations Ian Horrocks
• Re: Timeline herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: RDF Semantics review: RDFS interpretations herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• regrets til End of Febr ruediger.klein@daimlerchrysler.com
• Timeline Jeremy Carroll
• RDF vocbulary compatibility Jeremy Carroll
• Regrets for 6-Feb and 13-Feb Jonathan Dale

Thursday, 6 February 2003

• Re: RDF Semantics review: RDFS interpretations Ian Horrocks
• Suggested OWL Full semantic changes Jeremy Carroll
• RDF Semantics review: RDFS interpretations herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• RDF Semantics review: several corrections /suggestions for clarification herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• comments on 'social meaning' issue pat hayes
• Fwd: RDF SCHEMA REVIEW (ACTION VOLZ) Jim Hendler
• regrets: telecon Feb. 6 Leo Obrst
• Re: question: datatype reasoning? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: question: datatype reasoning? Ian Horrocks
• Regrets for 2003-02-06 Nick Gibbins
• Regrets - Phonecon - Feb 6 Stanton, John

Wednesday, 5 February 2003

• Re: question: datatype reasoning? Frank van Harmelen
• Overview ready to go (resolutions to roadmap, datatypes, intersectionOf issues) Deborah McGuinness
• Re: WOWG: Agenda Feb 6 telecon Jeremy Carroll
• WOWG: Agenda Feb 6 telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Jeremy Carroll
• Re: 'xsd:redefine' removed from XML presentation syntax Schemas Masahiro Hori
• 'xsd:redefine' removed from XML presentation syntax Schemas Masahiro Hori
• Re: ***Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Frank van Harmelen
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: update to Overview Document - action completed Jim Hendler
• Re: Datatype Figure (and reiteration of WG datatype resolution) Jim Hendler

Tuesday, 4 February 2003

• Re: ***Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Jos De_Roo
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Deborah McGuinness
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Dan Connolly
• Re: ***Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Dan Connolly
• Re: Reference document ready for review Deborah McGuinness
• Regrets: 6 Feb Telecon Smith, Michael K
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Deborah McGuinness
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Deborah McGuinness
• Re: update to Overview Document - action completed Deborah McGuinness
• ***Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Deborah McGuinness
• Re: update to Overview Document - action completed Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Dan Connolly
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Dan Connolly
• RE: Datatype Confusion Smith, Michael K
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Frank van Harmelen
• Re: Datatype Confusion Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Dan Connolly
• Re: Datatype Confusion Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Datatype Figure Raphael Volz
• Datatype Confusion Raphael Volz
• Re: question: datatype reasoning? Ian Horrocks
• Reference document ready for review Guus Schreiber
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Ian Horrocks
• update to Overview Document - action completed Deborah McGuinness
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Deborah McGuinness
• Re: question on rdf migration path Deborah McGuinness

Monday, 3 February 2003

• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Jim Hendler
• Re: question on rdf migration path Christopher Welty
• question on rdf migration path Deborah McGuinness
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Deborah McGuinness
• Apologies for Jan 30 telecon -was- Re: probable regrets for thurs Evan Wallace
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Dan Connolly
• imports and entailments Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Annotations and non-mon example Jim Hendler

Tuesday, 28 January 2003

• changes to RDFS MT post-last-call pat hayes

Monday, 3 February 2003

• Re: The Ugly Test Jos De_Roo

Sunday, 2 February 2003

• RE: Annotations and non-mon example Jos De_Roo
• OWL gets its first mention in the Washington Post Frank van Harmelen
• Re: correction RE: The Ugly Test Jos De_Roo

Saturday, 1 February 2003

• Re: annotations was Re: MINUES: Teleconference 30 Jan 2003 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: The Ugly Test Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: correction RE: The Ugly Test Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Annotations and non-mon example Jeremy Carroll
• Re: annotations was Re: MINUES: Teleconference 30 Jan 2003 Jeremy Carroll
• correction RE: The Ugly Test Jos De_Roo
• Re: [Fwd: Review of Reference Document] Ian Horrocks
• RE: The Ugly Test Jos De_Roo

Last message date: Friday, 28 February 2003 19:47:09 UTC