- From: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:20:55 -0500
- To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl>
- CC: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
One minor update to the minutes from last telecon, I missed one of the participants (Jonathan Borden, who joined late). Revised minutes are below: ------------------------------------------------------------- WEB ONTOLOGY WORKING GROUP TELECON February 13, 2003 Chair: Guus Schreiber Scribe: Jeff Heflin Chat Log: http://www.w3.org/2003/02/13-webont-irc#T19-00-40 1) ADMIN (10-15 min) 1.1 Role Call Present: NickG, DanC, PeterFPS, JeffHeflin, IanH, LeoObrst, ChrisW, Marwan_Sabbouh, Yassar, Baget, PatH, M_Smith, Evan_Wallace, DeborahMcG, MikeDean Joined Late: ZivH, Guus, Jeremy, JosD, Jonathan Borden Regrets: Dale, Hendler, Klein, van Harmelen, Hori 1.2 Approval of Minutes of last telecon ACCEPTED the following as a true record of Feb 6 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0126.html 1.3 Agenda Amendments None 1.4 Telecon Schedule Next telecon: February 20 Scribe: Leo Orbst 1.5 Tech plenary Tech plenary page: http://www.w3.org/2002/10/allgroupoverview.html - Mar 4: editor's meeting on Tuesday Deb would like to have speaker phone at meeting - Mar 6-7: Initial Tech Plenary Semantic Web Architecture page - http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/meetings/tech-200303/ 2. STATUS RDFCore LC REVIEWS (15-20 min.) 2.1 RDF Schema Review by Volz: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0064.html Discussion about "social meaning." Although, WG members disagree on this topic, most feel the wording should at least be clarified ACTION: Guus will do summary review of this doc 2.2 RDF Semantics Agenda item postponed 2.3 RDF Concepts baget's review of concepts, plus a couple other messages http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2003Feb/0056.html Jeremey suggested that social meaning be discussed at tech plenary 3 ISSUETTES (60-75 min) 3.1 Annotations See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jan/0490.html RESOLVED: to adopt Peter's Proposal 2 (from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0128.html) with an explcit type label for annotation properties (e.g. owl:AnnotationProperty) (abstains: Ian, Jos DeRoo, Mike Dean, Mike Smith) ACTION: Jeremy to add 0542 case to test suite ACTION Schreiber: explain AnnototationProperty in ref ACTION Schreiber: specify in owl.owl that label, seeAlso, isDefinedBy ACTION: Mike will update guide to discuss annotations 3.2 Imports and entailments ACTION: Ian to get Sean to generate syntax checker test case for imports (i.e., on failure assume doc is OWL-FULL) ACTION Jos: send negative experience on imports to list 3.3 rdf:XMLLiteral, xml:lang in OWL Lite Dan: Use case for XML literals and cardinality constraints: A product has XML descriptions in different files, but can only have one description. Are the two files consistent? RESOLVED: abstract syntax uses same syntax as RDF for literals (abstains: Connolly) ACTION Jeremy: to produce test case for XML literal 3.4 RDF compatibility Item not discussed 3.5 OWL DL syntax Item not discussed 3.6 Relation OWL Lite with RDF(S) Item not discussed 4. DOCUMENT STATUS (10-15 min.) RESOLVED: rename AS&S to S&AS (Semantics & Abstract Syntax). (Abstain: Pat) ACTION: Massimo publish reference (continued) ACTION: Connolly get Tests published
Received on Thursday, 20 February 2003 10:20:55 UTC