Re: OWL Syntax

Jeremy Carroll asserted: 
>The abstract syntax undermines the I18N requirements agreed by the WG.

This has been mentioned in a number of emails, but it doesn't seem
to correspond to anything that I could find in the Requirements or 
Issues documents.  Can someone explain how to dereference the I18N 
identifier?

-Evan

Evan K. Wallace
Manufacturing Systems Integration Division
NIST

Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 17:26:56 UTC