- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 12:40:12 -0500 (EST)
- To: dlm@ksl.Stanford.EDU
- Cc: connolly@w3.org, Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl, hendler@cs.umd.edu, www-webont-wg@w3.org
From: Deborah McGuinness <dlm@ksl.Stanford.EDU> Subject: Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 09:31:11 -0800 > > excellent. > i think to publish we need a resolution on > 1 - jim's request to take datatypes out and peter's request not to take them > out Jim's request, as I understand it, was not to take datatypes out, but instead was to fix the discussion. You could look at AS&S to see how datatypes are treated. > 2 - the current addition of intersection of named classes only which is what > I understood was decided on the phone call and ian's and peter's > understanding of named classes and restrictions and owl lite. A quick perusal of the minutes of the phone call turned up nothing indicating that intersection was only for named classes. Instead the minutes say that interesection is to be as indicated in AS&S. > 3 - franks updates today. > > frank has write lock > > d peter
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2003 12:42:20 UTC