RE: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests

Done.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jos De_Roo [mailto:jos.deroo@agfa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 5:42 PM
To: Dan Connolly <connolly
Cc: Sean Bechhofer; WebOnt WG; www-webont-wg-request@w3.org
Subject: Re: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests




> Excellent detail work...

indeed

> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 11:08, Sean Bechhofer wrote:
> > While trying to write a species validator, I've come across the
following,
> > which I think may be errors in the test suite.
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/miscellaneous/example001.rdf
> >
> > uses owl:InverseOf rather than owl:inverseOf.
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/miscellaneous/example002.rdf
> >
> > has an OWL namespace declaration of:
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2002/7/owl
> >
> > i.e. "7" rather than "07".
>
> OK, I fixed both of those.
>
> $Id: example001.rdf,v 1.3 2003/02/12 20:00:39 connolly Exp $
> $Id: example002.rdf,v 1.3 2003/02/12 20:01:49 connolly Exp $
>
> Jos, those come from the guide, no?

Yes Dan they do and that's why I asked in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0155.html
to
[[
I propose that the Guide editors update their
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/guide-src/wine.owl
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/guide-src/food.owl
(because they are the source documents
and I will then update the tests)
]]

> Is there any mechanism for checking that they stay
> in sync?

Well, manually I guess, which is the bane of our existence ;-)
(certainly if you have broken fingers ;-) hope it's going better)

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 19:43:05 UTC