- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 13:59:23 -0600
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Cc: Deborah McGuinness <dlm@KSL.Stanford.EDU>, Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>, webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Umm... I haven't heard from Deb nor Frank; did anybody actually tell them we'd like to publish an update to WD-owl-features today? Publication of semantics, guide, test, and requirements are in progress, but I guess I propose to withdraw my action to publish Overview (nee feature synopsis). Somebody please *phone me* if that's not OK. Note I get on a plane to SNA on Weds for a TAG ftf. "2003-02-05 15:06 - 19:41 MCI->SNA Wednesday AMERICAN AIRLINES #1627" -- http://www.w3.org/2003/02dc-sna/itin1b.txt derived from http://www.w3.org/2003/02dc-sna/itin1.rdf also, in picture form: http://www.w3.org/2003/02dc-sna/itin1.png On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 13:46, Jim Hendler wrote: > Frank, Deb - > As neither of you were able to attend today's telecon, I took an > action to make a request of the two of you with respect to your > document. Basically, it appears that the WG consensus was that the > feature (overview) document doesn't quite reflect the correct status > of the language with respect to intersectionOf, and that we would > prefer if it were fixed in the overview document, rather than > changing AS&S or other re-engineering of the language. > > The consensus was that since it is easy to create certain kinds of > intersections in Owl Lite, should include owl:intersectionOf in the > Owl Lite vocabulary list in the Overview document. The discussion > of this feature can look liek the discussion of the other features > that have restrictions in lite - i.e. the paragraph just says > smething like "can only be used with named classes" (oe however that > is made clear in the Overview). > > If others on the WG who were on the call wish to explain this better > than I did, or to make specific wording changes, please let me know. > > Note: this reflects a consensus that this document change is > desirable, not a reopening of an issue or a change in what is and > isn't in Lite (as it is now normatively defined in the AS&S document). -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ office: tel:+1-913-491-0501
Received on Monday, 3 February 2003 14:59:56 UTC