- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:35:29 +0100
- To: "Sean Bechhofer <seanb" <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>, www-webont-wg-request@w3.org
that's right Sean
I propose that the Guide editors update their
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/guide-src/wine.owl
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/guide-src/food.owl
(because they are the source documents
and I will then update the tests)
thanks for figuring out
-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Sean Bechhofer
<seanb@cs.man.ac.u To: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
k> cc:
Sent by: Subject: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests
www-webont-wg-requ
est@w3.org
2003-02-12 06:08
PM
While trying to write a species validator, I've come across the following,
which I think may be errors in the test suite.
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/miscellaneous/example001.rdf
uses owl:InverseOf rather than owl:inverseOf.
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/miscellaneous/example002.rdf
has an OWL namespace declaration of:
http://www.w3.org/2002/7/owl
i.e. "7" rather than "07". In addition, within that file, there are
occurrences of non-OWL vocabulary usage, such as hasClass on a
Restriction. Of course there's nothing wrong with that as it's not in the
OWL namespace :-)).
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/maxCardinality/example001.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/miscellaneous/example001.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/maxCardinality/example002.rdf
all use owl:differentIndividalFrom rather than owl:differentFrom.
Cheers,
Sean
--
Sean Bechhofer
seanb@cs.man.ac.uk
http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 15:36:41 UTC