Re: WOWG: Agenda Feb 13 telecon

I forgot to add to the agenda under item 4 (Document status) the 
suggestion from Eric Miller to rename AS&S to S&AS (Semantics & Abstract 
Syntax), for totally nontechnical reasons.
Guus

Guus Schreiber wrote:
> 
> WEB ONTOLOGY WORKING GROUP
> AGENDA/LOGISTICS
> February 13, 2003
> 
> 1200 US East Coast
> 0900 US West Coast
> 1700 London
> 0200 Tokyo (next day)
> 
> 
> Duration: 90-120 minutes
> 
> PHONE INFORMATION
> To use Zakim:
> Dial +1.617.761.6200
> At the "enter your passcode followed by the pound key" message,
> enter 9326#.
> Note: When you join the telecon please state your name
> 
> CHAT INFO
> Simultaneous IRC Chat
> irc:irc.w3.org (port 6665)
> #webont
> 
> Chair: Guus Schreiber
> Scribe: Jeff Heflin
> 
> 
> 1) ADMIN (10-15 min)
> 
> 
> 1.1 Role Call
> 
> Regrets: Dale, Hendler, Klein, van Harmelen
> See list archive for last-minute regrets
> 
> 
> 1.2 Approval of Minutes of last telecon
> 
> PROPOSED to accept the following as a true record of Feb 6
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0126.html
> 
> 
> 1.3 Agenda Amendments
> 
> 
> 1.4 Telecon Schedule
> 
> Next telecon: February 20
> Scribe:   TBD
> 
> 
> 1.5  Tech plenary
> 
> Tech plenary page:
> http://www.w3.org/2002/10/allgroupoverview.html
> 
> - Mar 4: editor's meeting on Tuesday
> 
> - Mar 6-7: Initial Tech Plenary Semantic Web Architecture page -
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/meetings/tech-200303/
> 
> 
> 2. STATUS RDFCore LC REVIEWS (15-20 min.)
> 
> 
> 2.1 RDF Schema
> 
> Review by Volz:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0064.html
> 
> ACTION; Pat Various Properties clarify
> DONE:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0065.html
> 
> 
> 2.2 RDF Semantics
> 
> Review by ter Horst:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0067.html
> 
> 
> 2.3 RDF Concepts
> 
> ACTION: review by Baget
> 
> 
> 3 ISSUETTES (60-75 min)
> 
> 
> 3.1 Annotations
> 
> See:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jan/0490.html
> 
> ACTION: Jeremy propose resolution for annotation semantics
> DONE
> Proposal to resolve by Carroll:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0090.html
> 
> Proposals by Patel-Schneider:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0100.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0128.html
> 
> ACTION: Pat to propose a resoultion prior to next weeks telecon
> DONE:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0135.html
> 
> PROPOSAL: to adopt Peter's solution, with an explcit type label for
> annotation properties (e.g. owl:AnnotationProperty)
> 
> 
> 3.2 Imports and entailments
> 
> Carroll's message:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0014.html
> 
> - check whether this is covered by the proposal(s) under 3.1
> 
> 
> 3.3 rdf:XMLLiteral, xml:lang in OWL Lite
> 
> See:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jan/0488.html
> 
> Proposal to resolve by Carroll:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0085.html
> 
> Discussion:
> Patel-Schenider:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0091.html
> Carroll:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0093.html
> Hendler:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0098.html
> 
> See also Carrols OWL syntax note, in particular:
> http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/owl-syntax/2003-12-Feb/dl-syntax.html#dl-dataLiteral 
> 
> and the mapping rule for DatatypeID( rdf:XMLLiteral ) in the same document.
> 
> 
> 3.4 RDF compatibility
> 
> See:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0083.html
> 
> Proposal to resolve by Carroll:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0086.html
> 
> Discussion:
> Patel-Schenider:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0094.html
> 
> Relevant input: Carrol's OWL syntax note:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0146.html
> 
> Note from Carroll wrt. the latter: In the differences section
>   http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/owl-syntax/2003-12-Feb/diffs.html
> under RDF Compatibility/builtin names we see this issuette relates to 
> one sentence of the mapping rules that excludes lots, and I instead 
> propose that we allow everything unless it is prohibited by the table of 
> urirefs:
> 
> http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/owl-syntax/2003-12-Feb/dl-syntax.html#builtin-urirefs 
> 
> 
> 
> 3.5 OWL DL syntax
> 
> See:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jan/0489.html
> 
> ACTION Jeremy: Propose Resolution for changing mapping rules to handle
> "strong typing"
> 
> ACTION Jeremy: Send draft on document for concrete syntax to Peter by 
> Monday
> DONEL
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0146.html
> 
> Note from Jeremy:  the differences section highlights the crucial
> differences everything else is either an orthogonal issuette, a bugfix 
> or a trade-off.
> 
> 
> 3.6 OWL Lite name in relation to DL/Full
> 
> Context: see message by Hendler:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0130.html
> 
> 
> 4. DOCUMENT STATUS (10-15 min.)
> 
> ACTION: Connolly re: security
> 
> ACTION: Jeremy/HP & Jim review Reference
> 
> - Planning for LC candidate documents
> 
> 
> 6. AOB (0-5 min.)
> 
> 

-- 
A. Th. Schreiber, SWI, University of Amsterdam,
http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/usr/Schreiber/home.html

Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 12:07:49 UTC