WOWG: Agenda Feb 13 telecon

WEB ONTOLOGY WORKING GROUP
AGENDA/LOGISTICS
February 13, 2003

1200 US East Coast
0900 US West Coast
1700 London
0200 Tokyo (next day)


Duration: 90-120 minutes

PHONE INFORMATION
To use Zakim:
Dial +1.617.761.6200
At the "enter your passcode followed by the pound key" message,
enter 9326#.
Note: When you join the telecon please state your name

CHAT INFO
Simultaneous IRC Chat
irc:irc.w3.org (port 6665)
#webont

Chair: Guus Schreiber
Scribe: Jeff Heflin


1) ADMIN (10-15 min)


1.1 Role Call

Regrets: Dale, Hendler, Klein, van Harmelen
See list archive for last-minute regrets


1.2 Approval of Minutes of last telecon

PROPOSED to accept the following as a true record of Feb 6
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0126.html


1.3 Agenda Amendments


1.4 Telecon Schedule

Next telecon: February 20
Scribe:   TBD


1.5  Tech plenary

Tech plenary page:
http://www.w3.org/2002/10/allgroupoverview.html

- Mar 4: editor's meeting on Tuesday

- Mar 6-7: Initial Tech Plenary Semantic Web Architecture page -
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/meetings/tech-200303/


2. STATUS RDFCore LC REVIEWS (15-20 min.)


2.1 RDF Schema

Review by Volz:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0064.html

ACTION; Pat Various Properties clarify
DONE:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0065.html


2.2 RDF Semantics

Review by ter Horst:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0067.html


2.3 RDF Concepts

ACTION: review by Baget


3 ISSUETTES (60-75 min)


3.1 Annotations

See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jan/0490.html

ACTION: Jeremy propose resolution for annotation semantics
DONE
Proposal to resolve by Carroll:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0090.html

Proposals by Patel-Schneider:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0100.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0128.html

ACTION: Pat to propose a resoultion prior to next weeks telecon
DONE:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0135.html

PROPOSAL: to adopt Peter's solution, with an explcit type label for
annotation properties (e.g. owl:AnnotationProperty)


3.2 Imports and entailments

Carroll's message:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0014.html

- check whether this is covered by the proposal(s) under 3.1


3.3 rdf:XMLLiteral, xml:lang in OWL Lite

See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jan/0488.html

Proposal to resolve by Carroll:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0085.html

Discussion:
Patel-Schenider:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0091.html
Carroll:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0093.html
Hendler:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0098.html

See also Carrols OWL syntax note, in particular:
http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/owl-syntax/2003-12-Feb/dl-syntax.html#dl-dataLiteral
and the mapping rule for DatatypeID( rdf:XMLLiteral ) in the same document.


3.4 RDF compatibility

See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0083.html

Proposal to resolve by Carroll:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0086.html

Discussion:
Patel-Schenider:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0094.html

Relevant input: Carrol's OWL syntax note:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0146.html

Note from Carroll wrt. the latter: In the differences section
   http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/owl-syntax/2003-12-Feb/diffs.html
under RDF Compatibility/builtin names we see this issuette relates to 
one sentence of the mapping rules that excludes lots, and I instead 
propose that we allow everything unless it is prohibited by the table of 
urirefs:
 
http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/owl-syntax/2003-12-Feb/dl-syntax.html#builtin-urirefs


3.5 OWL DL syntax

See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jan/0489.html

ACTION Jeremy: Propose Resolution for changing mapping rules to handle
"strong typing"

ACTION Jeremy: Send draft on document for concrete syntax to Peter by Monday
DONEL
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0146.html

Note from Jeremy:  the differences section highlights the crucial
differences everything else is either an orthogonal issuette, a bugfix 
or a trade-off.


3.6 OWL Lite name in relation to DL/Full

Context: see message by Hendler:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0130.html


4. DOCUMENT STATUS (10-15 min.)

ACTION: Connolly re: security

ACTION: Jeremy/HP & Jim review Reference

- Planning for LC candidate documents


6. AOB (0-5 min.)


-- 
A. Th. Schreiber, SWI, University of Amsterdam,
http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/usr/Schreiber/home.html

Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 11:47:40 UTC