- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:57:07 +0100
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
PROPOSAL: rdf:XMLLiteral is a builtin datatype in OWL Lite contingent on a satisfactory response from RDF Core WG on the following comment. Draft msg to www-rdf-comments ===================== This is a message from the WebOnt WG to RDF Core WG concerning the Last Call design of rdf:XMLLiteral and rdf:parseType="Literal". For the full integration of this feature of RDF into OWL we require that the denotation in the domain of discourse be fully defined by the source RDF/XML file. Please remove sufficient implementation variability to ensure that this is the case. An example fix would be to require an RDF/XML parser to use a specific canonicalization on input. We have resolved that rdf:XMLLiteral is a builtin datatype in OWL Lite, OWL DL and OWL Full contingent on a satisfactory response from RDF Core WG on this comment. ========== Note to WebOnt - the phrasing leaves open that RDFCore stick with the aspect of the current design in which the parser is *not* required to canonicalize but is required to ensure that (later) canonicalization is possible. With this design an OWL implementation would need to either: - use a canonicalizing parser (a competitive market - all are free as far as I know) - use any RDF/XML parser and a separate canonicalizing component. Hence a different example fix would be to change all the documents to only ever use Exclusive Canonicalization with comments and with no special namespaces. The initial motivation for this separation in the design was a desire to not alienate parser writers who did not need canonicalization because they were only doing some easier metadata processing.
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2003 14:56:46 UTC