- From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:00:05 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- cc: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Dan Connolly wrote: > > Of course there's nothing wrong with that as it's not in the > > OWL namespace :-)). > > Oh, but there is; those are not OWL Full documents: > > "An OWL Full document is an RDF/XML document [RDF/XML Syntax], for which > the corresponding RDF graph [RDF Concepts] does not use any URI > references starting with the prefix http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl# > except those found in the [RDF Schema for OWL]." > -- http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/snapshot#docConformance Following this up, the test files: http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I3.2/bad001.rdf RDF : http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#cardinalityQ in OWL Namespace RDF : http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasClassQ in OWL Namespace OWL-Full: NO http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I3.2/bad002.rdf RDF : http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasClassQ in OWL Namespace RDF : http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#maxCardinalityQ in OWL Namespace OWL-Full: NO http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I3.2/bad003.rdf RDF : http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasClassQ in OWL Namespace RDF : http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#minCardinalityQ in OWL Namespace OWL-Full: NO are described in the Manifest files as being OWL-Lite. However, referring to the above, they are not, as they include URI references in the OWL namespace which are not in the RDF Schema. I realise that in this case this is the point of the test, but the Manifest should reflect this, particularly if the test ontologies are to be used to test things like species validators. Similarly for http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/maxCardinality/inconsistent001.rdf http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/maxCardinality/inconsistent002.rdf http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/miscellaneous/example002.rdf which are described as being OWL-Full in the Manifest, but these are side-effects of the problems I highlighted earlier. Cheers, Sean -- Sean Bechhofer seanb@cs.man.ac.uk http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2003 05:00:40 UTC