Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports from Jonathan Borden on 2003-02-13 (www-webont-wg@w3.org from February 2003)

From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:37:28 -0500
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00c601c2d308$da4354c0$7c01a8c0@ne.mediaone.net>

> >
> > Sure, let rdf:comment be applied to classes and properties, it is a
(data
> > valued) property *like any other*
>
> [...]
>
> But how?  Other data-valued properties cannot be applied to classes and
> properties in OWL Lite and OWL DL.
>

doh! aaarrrghhh... these sorts of things are going to make OWL-Lite
conceptually quite heavy, perhaps unbearably so :-(((

Jonathan

Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 22:00:17 UTC