- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 15:19:15 +0000
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- CC: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, www-webont-wg@w3.org
Peter - this is not intended as a replacement for other constraints. It is intended as a guide for what the mapping rules should be. I am not proposing changes that would allow the specific triple you exhibit. Jeremy Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> > Subject: Re: WOWG: Agenda Feb 6 telecon > Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 17:49:06 +0000 > > [...] > > >>Part of that which is baked, and ready for WG discussion is the following >>suggestion: >> >>[[ >>For every node of the graph and every URI reference used as a property or >>datatype at least one of the following holds: >>+ It is one of the built-in URI references from RDF, RDFS, OWL or XML >>Schema datatypes. >>+ It is a literal. >>+ It is the subject of at least one triple with predicate rdf:type; with an >>object other than rdfs:Class, rdf:Property, owl:DeprecatedClass, >>owl:DeprecatedProperty, owl:FunctionalProperty >>]] >> > > This would allow > > ex:aa rdf:type ex:aa . > > which doesn't sound very much like OWL DL to me. > > peter >
Received on Friday, 7 February 2003 10:19:29 UTC