- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 00:41:47 +0100
- To: "Dan Connolly <connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>, WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>, www-webont-wg-request@w3.org
> Excellent detail work... indeed > On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 11:08, Sean Bechhofer wrote: > > While trying to write a species validator, I've come across the following, > > which I think may be errors in the test suite. > > > > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/miscellaneous/example001.rdf > > > > uses owl:InverseOf rather than owl:inverseOf. > > > > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/miscellaneous/example002.rdf > > > > has an OWL namespace declaration of: > > > > http://www.w3.org/2002/7/owl > > > > i.e. "7" rather than "07". > > OK, I fixed both of those. > > $Id: example001.rdf,v 1.3 2003/02/12 20:00:39 connolly Exp $ > $Id: example002.rdf,v 1.3 2003/02/12 20:01:49 connolly Exp $ > > Jos, those come from the guide, no? Yes Dan they do and that's why I asked in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0155.html to [[ I propose that the Guide editors update their http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/guide-src/wine.owl http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/guide-src/food.owl (because they are the source documents and I will then update the tests) ]] > Is there any mechanism for checking that they stay > in sync? Well, manually I guess, which is the bane of our existence ;-) (certainly if you have broken fingers ;-) hope it's going better) -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 18:42:38 UTC