www-webont-wg@w3.org from February 2003 by author

Christopher Welty

• links to published documents (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: From our comments list (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: question on rdf migration path (Monday, 3 February)

Dan Connolly

• at risk/regrets this Thu (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics review: RDFS interpretations (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: implementation report issues for moving through CR (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Syntax Changes (domain etc. in owl NS) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Syntax Changes (AllDifferent etc.) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Imports issue (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: TEST: extra credit - arithmetic (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: a proposal for defining OWL DL documents (was Re: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports) (Monday, 17 February)
• RE: Streaming OWL Parsers (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: Streaming OWL Parsers (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: XMLLiteral (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: From our comments list (Lite/DL/Full) (Thursday, 13 February)
• RE: OWL Syntax (I18N) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics review: RDFS interpretations (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics review: RDFS interpretations (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: ***Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon (Monday, 3 February)

Deborah McGuinness

• regrets for thurs feb 27 and tues march 4 (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Overview Last Call Candidate Document (was Re: EDITORS IMPORTANT: Last Call Candidates) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: OWL syntax task force (Sunday, 23 February)
• owl tools (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: links to published documents (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: WOWG: agenda Feb 20 telecon (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite (Thursday, 13 February)
• Overview ready to go (resolutions to roadmap, datatypes, intersectionOf issues) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: Reference document ready for review (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: update to Overview Document - action completed (Tuesday, 4 February)
• ***Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon (Tuesday, 4 February)
• update to Overview Document - action completed (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: question on rdf migration path (Tuesday, 4 February)
• question on rdf migration path (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon (Monday, 3 February)

Dickinson, Ian J

• RE: Imports issue (Thursday, 20 February)

Enrico Motta

• FIRST EUROPEAN SUMMER SCHOOL ON ONTOLOGICAL ENGINEERING AND THE SEMANTIC WEB (SSSW-2003) (Wednesday, 12 February)

Evan Wallace

• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: OWL Syntax (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Apologies for Jan 30 telecon -was- Re: probable regrets for thurs (Monday, 3 February)

Frank van Harmelen

• Re: question: datatype reasoning? (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: ***Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon (Tuesday, 4 February)
• OWL gets its first mention in the Washington Post (Sunday, 2 February)

Guus Schreiber

• OWL syntax task force (Sunday, 23 February)
• Re: Imports issue (Thursday, 20 February)
• IImports issue (Wednesday, 19 February)
• WOWG: agenda Feb 20 telecon (Wednesday, 19 February)
• ACTION: AnnotationPropert in owl.owl (Wednesday, 19 February)
• SEM + TEST: editorial comment (Wednesday, 19 February)
• WOWG: agenda Feb 13 telecon (revised) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: OWL Syntax (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: WOWG: Agenda Feb 13 telecon (Wednesday, 12 February)
• WOWG: Agenda Feb 13 telecon (Wednesday, 12 February)
• WOWGL: telecon time Feb 13 (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Editors/authors Reference document (Monday, 10 February)
• WOWG: Agenda Feb 6 telecon (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Reference document ready for review (Tuesday, 4 February)

herman.ter.horst@philips.com

• Re: RDF Semantics review: RDFS interpretations (Friday, 21 February)
• RDF Semantics review mailed to rdf-comments (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Proposed Consensus Review of RDF Core Documents (Thursday, 20 February)
• RDF Semantics review: further comments (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics review: RDFS interpretations (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: WOWG: Agenda Feb 13 telecon / partial regrets, RDF Semantics review (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: AS & S Review: overview (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: Timeline (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: Timeline (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: Timeline (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics review: RDFS interpretations (Friday, 7 February)
• RDF Semantics review: RDFS interpretations (Thursday, 6 February)
• RDF Semantics review: several corrections /suggestions for clarification (Thursday, 6 February)

Ian Horrocks

• Re: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches (Thursday, 27 February)
• RE: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: Imports issue (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite (Sunday, 16 February)
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: Annotations use case (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: Annotations use case (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: Annotations use case (Sunday, 9 February)
• Re: ISSUE: annotations (Sunday, 9 February)
• Re: Annotations use case (Sunday, 9 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics review: RDFS interpretations (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics review: RDFS interpretations (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: question: datatype reasoning? (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: question: datatype reasoning? (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [Fwd: Review of Reference Document] (Saturday, 1 February)

Jean-François BAGET

• Regrets for Feb. 20 (Thursday, 20 February)

Jeff Heflin

• Re: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics February 27 (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: EDITORS IMPORTANT: Last Call Candidates (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: WOWG: agenda Feb 20 telecon (Thursday, 20 February)
• Minutes from 2/13/2003 Telecon (Thursday, 13 February)

Jeremy Carroll

• Re: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: TEST: datatypes and cardinality (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: TEST: harder DL tests (3 SAT) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: TEST: harder DL tests (3 SAT) (Friday, 28 February)
• TEST: rdf compatibility (Friday, 28 February)
• TEST, GUIDE: food.owl, wine.owl (Friday, 28 February)
• TEST: datatypes and cardinality (Friday, 28 February)
• TEST: harder DL tests (3 SAT) (Friday, 28 February)
• TEST: owl:foobar (Friday, 28 February)
• RE: EDITORS IMPORTANT: Last Call Candidates (Thursday, 27 February)
• RE: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches (Thursday, 27 February)
• Social meaning discussion 6th March (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: OWL syntax (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: OWL Syntax (Tuesday, 25 February)
• RE: Chairs' decisions about reopening some issues (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Formally addressing issue: rdf compatibility (Tuesday, 25 February)
• RE: Chairs' decisions about reopening some issues (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Syntax links (Friday, 21 February)
• Apology (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Proposed Consensus Review of RDF Core Documents (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Imports issue (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Imports issue (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: TEST: xmlliteral, ruby (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: TEST: editor update (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: SEM + TEST: editorial comment (Wednesday, 19 February)
• TEST: xmlliteral, ruby (Wednesday, 19 February)
• TEST: annotations - also one query on S&AS (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: TEST: editor update (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: OWL Syntax - complex restrictions (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: TEST: extra credit - arithmetic (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: SEM + TEST: editorial comment (Wednesday, 19 February)
• TEST: editor update (Wednesday, 19 February)
• OWL Syntax - complex restrictions (Wednesday, 19 February)
• TEST: extra credit - arithmetic (Wednesday, 19 February)
• RE: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports (Monday, 17 February)
• RE: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports (Monday, 17 February)
• RE: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports (Monday, 17 February)
• RE: the relationships between OWL species (Monday, 17 February)
• RE: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports (Monday, 17 February)
• RE: Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Monday, 17 February)
• RE: the relationships between OWL species (was Re: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports) (Monday, 17 February)
• RE: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: Streaming OWL Parsers (Sunday, 16 February)
• Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Thursday, 13 February)
• Social meaning link (Thursday, 13 February)
• XMLLiteral (Thursday, 13 February)
• RE: OWL Syntax (Thursday, 13 February)
• RE: OWL Syntax (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: OWL Syntax (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: OWL Syntax (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: OWL Syntax (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: OWL Syntax (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: OWL Syntax (Wednesday, 12 February)
• OWL Syntax (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Sunday, 9 February)
• Re: RDF vocbulary compatibility (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: ISSUE: XMLLiteral and xml:lang (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: ISSUE: annotations (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: ISSUE: rdf compatibility (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: ISSUE: XMLLiteral and xml:lang (Friday, 7 February)
• Proposal to open issues (Friday, 7 February)
• ISSUE: rdf compatibility (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: typing nodes (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: Timeline (Friday, 7 February)
• Timeline (Friday, 7 February)
• RDF vocbulary compatibility (Friday, 7 February)
• Suggested OWL Full semantic changes (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: question: datatype reasoning? (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: WOWG: Agenda Feb 6 telecon (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon (Wednesday, 5 February)
• imports and entailments (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: correction RE: The Ugly Test (Saturday, 1 February)
• RE: Annotations and non-mon example (Saturday, 1 February)
• Re: annotations was Re: MINUES: Teleconference 30 Jan 2003 (Saturday, 1 February)

Jerome Euzenat

• Re: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics February 27 (Thursday, 27 February)
• Review RDF: Concepts and Abstract Syntax (1rst part) (Thursday, 13 February)
• XSLT transformation from OWL XML to OWL RDF (Friday, 7 February)

Jim Hendler

• Re: TEST: rdf compatibility (Friday, 28 February)
• ADMIN: Minutes of February 27 telecon (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: Formally addressing issue: rdf compatibility (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches (Thursday, 27 February)
• ADMIN: Abbreviated agenda for today, with agenda ammendments (Thursday, 27 February)
• ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics February 27 (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches (Wednesday, 26 February)
• EDITORS IMPORTANT: Last Call Candidates (Monday, 24 February)
• Chairs' decisions about reopening some issues (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: AW: DAML -> OWL Converter generates OWL FULL only / OWL VALIDATOR (Sunday, 23 February)
• Re: owl tools (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: AW: Syntax Changes (domain etc. in owl NS) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Review of RDF documents submitted (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: DAML -> OWL Converter BROKEN (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: DAML -> OWL Converter BROKEN (Thursday, 20 February)
• implementation report issues for moving through CR (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Imports issue (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Proposed Consensus Review of RDF Core Documents (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Proposed Consensus Review of RDF Core Documents (Thursday, 20 February)
• Proposed Consensus Review of RDF Core Documents (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: List of members for documents (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: ACTION: AnnotationPropert in owl.owl (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Member list for documents (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Review of Reference Document (Tuesday, 18 February)
• List of members for documents (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Review of Reference Document (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: the relationships between OWL species (Monday, 17 February)
• Social Meaning Discussion (Monday, 17 February)
• WOWG: Congrats to Ora Lassila (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite (Sunday, 16 February)
• DL and Lite namespaces? (Sunday, 16 February)
• From our comments list (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: Annotations use case (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Tech plenary Agenda posted (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: Timeline (Tuesday, 11 February)
• WOWG: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Scribe Log of 2/6 telecon (posted for Raphael) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: Annotations use case (Sunday, 9 February)
• Re: ISSUE: XMLLiteral and xml:lang (Friday, 7 February)
• Regrets for Feb 13 (Friday, 7 February)
• WOWG: with respect to Chairs' decisions on proposed issues (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: Annotations use case (Friday, 7 February)
• Annotations use case (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: Timeline (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: Timeline (Friday, 7 February)
• Fwd: RDF SCHEMA REVIEW (ACTION VOLZ) (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: update to Overview Document - action completed (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Datatype Figure (and reiteration of WG datatype resolution) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon (Monday, 3 February)
• RE: Annotations and non-mon example (Monday, 3 February)

Jonathan Borden

• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite (Sunday, 16 February)
• Re: owl:imports experience: took it out (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: owl:imports experience: took it out (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: Streaming OWL Parsers (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: owl:imports experience: took it out (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: owl:imports experience: took it out (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite (Wednesday, 12 February)

Jonathan Dale

• Belated Regrets for 27-Feb (Thursday, 27 February)
• Belated regrets for 20-Feb-03 (Thursday, 20 February)
• Regrets for 6-Feb and 13-Feb (Friday, 7 February)

Jos De_Roo

• Re: TEST: harder DL tests (3 SAT) (Saturday, 1 March)
• Re: owl:complementOf in OWL Full (Wednesday, 26 February)
• owl:complementOf in OWL Full (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: TEST: xmlliteral, ruby (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: SEM + TEST: editorial comment (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: SEM + TEST: editorial comment (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite (Sunday, 16 February)
• RE: Streaming OWL Parsers (Saturday, 15 February)
• RE: Streaming OWL Parsers (Saturday, 15 February)
• Re: owl:imports experience: took it out (Saturday, 15 February)
• Re: owl:imports experience: took it out (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: owl:imports experience: took it out (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: owl:imports experience: took it out (Friday, 14 February)
• owl:imports experience: took it out (Thursday, 13 February)
• RE: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: OWL Syntax (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: Annotations use case (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Sunday, 9 February)
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Sunday, 9 February)
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Sunday, 9 February)
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: ***Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: The Ugly Test (Monday, 3 February)
• RE: Annotations and non-mon example (Sunday, 2 February)
• Re: correction RE: The Ugly Test (Sunday, 2 February)
• correction RE: The Ugly Test (Saturday, 1 February)
• RE: The Ugly Test (Saturday, 1 February)

Leo Obrst

• probable regrets: 2/27 telecon (Thursday, 27 February)
• ADMIN: Minutes of 2/20/03 Telecon (Sunday, 23 February)
• OWL datatype questions, with references (Sunday, 9 February)
• regrets: telecon Feb. 6 (Thursday, 6 February)

Lynn Andrea Stein

• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Monday, 24 February)

Masahiro Hori

• 'annotation' in RDF/XML ? (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Update: XML syntax document & Schema (draft for W3C Note) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Regrets: 13 Feb Telecon (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: AW: 'xsd:redefine' removed from XML presentation syntax Schemas (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: 'xsd:redefine' removed from XML presentation syntax Schemas (Wednesday, 5 February)
• 'xsd:redefine' removed from XML presentation syntax Schemas (Wednesday, 5 February)

Mike Dean

• documents vs. sublanguages (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: Annotations use case (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: Annotations use case (Friday, 7 February)

Nick Gibbins

• Regrets for 2003-02-06 (Thursday, 6 February)

pat hayes

• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: ISSUE: Classes as instances [old] (Thursday, 20 February)
• cited message re. 'social meaning' debate (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: From our comments list (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Tuesday, 11 February)
• comments on 'social meaning' issue (Thursday, 6 February)
• changes to RDFS MT post-last-call (Tuesday, 28 January)

Peter Crowther

• RE: Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Monday, 17 February)
• RE: Streaming OWL Parsers (Saturday, 15 February)
• RE: Streaming OWL Parsers (Friday, 14 February)
• RE: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite (Friday, 14 February)
• RE: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite (Friday, 14 February)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: TEST: harder DL tests (3 SAT) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: TEST: datatypes and cardinality (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: TEST: harder DL tests (3 SAT) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: Guide: Question re annotations (Thursday, 27 February)
• syntax task force - differences between the two approaches (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: OWL syntax task force (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: owl:complementOf in OWL Full (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Regrets for the teleconference 20 Feb (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: owl:complementOf in OWL Full (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: OWL Syntax (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: OWL Syntax (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: 'annotation' in RDF/XML ? (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: EDITORS IMPORTANT: Last Call Candidates (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Proposed Consensus Review of RDF Core Documents (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Imports issue (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Imports issue (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Member list for documents (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: List of members for documents (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: TEST: extra credit - arithmetic (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: OWL Syntax - complex restrictions (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: SEM + TEST: editorial comment (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: TEST: extra credit - arithmetic (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: OWL Lite vs OWL DL-Lite (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: the relationships between OWL species (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: the relationships between OWL species (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: a proposal for defining OWL DL documents (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: DL and Lite namespaces? (Sunday, 16 February)
• a proposal for defining OWL DL documents (was Re: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports) (Sunday, 16 February)
• Re: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports (Sunday, 16 February)
• the relationships between OWL species (was Re: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports) (Sunday, 16 February)
• changes to semantics document (Saturday, 15 February)
• Re: Streaming OWL Parsers (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: OWL Syntax (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: OWL Syntax (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: OWL Syntax (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: AS & S Review: overview (Tuesday, 11 February)
• proposals on annotations and imports (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: OWL datatype questions, with references (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Sunday, 9 February)
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Sunday, 9 February)
• Re: RDF vocbulary compatibility (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: ISSUE: annotations (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: AS & S Review: overview (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: AS & S Review: Appendix A.1: Correspondence between Abstract OWL and OWL DL (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: AS & S Review: Appendix A.1: Correspondence between Abstract OWL and OWL DL (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: RDF vocbulary compatibility (Friday, 7 February)
• possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: ISSUE: rdf compatibility (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: ISSUE: XMLLiteral and xml:lang (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: typing nodes (Friday, 7 February)
• typing nodes (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: OVERVIEW: WG preference - action from telecon (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: update to Overview Document - action completed (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: Datatype Confusion (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: Datatype Confusion (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: annotations was Re: MINUES: Teleconference 30 Jan 2003 (Saturday, 1 February)
• Re: The Ugly Test (Saturday, 1 February)

Raphael Volz

• AW: DAML -> OWL Converter generates OWL FULL only / OWL VALIDATOR (Friday, 21 February)
• AW: Syntax Changes (domain etc. in owl NS) (Thursday, 20 February)
• DAML -> OWL Converter BROKEN (Thursday, 20 February)
• Datatype Figure (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Datatype Confusion (Tuesday, 4 February)

ruediger.klein@daimlerchrysler.com

• regrets til End of Febr (Friday, 7 February)

Sean Bechhofer

• Re: TEST: harder DL tests (3 SAT) (Friday, 28 February)
• RE: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches (Thursday, 27 February)
• RE: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: syntax task force - differences between the two approaches (Thursday, 27 February)
• Regrets: 27 Feb Telecon (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: TEST: editor update (Monday, 24 February)
• owl:Ontology and imports (Thursday, 20 February)
• Syntax Changes (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Imports issue (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Imports issue (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: TEST: editor update (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: TEST: editor update (Wednesday, 19 February)
• RE: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests (Friday, 14 February)
• OWL, XML-RDF and Imports (Friday, 14 February)
• Streaming OWL Parsers (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests (Thursday, 13 February)
• [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests (Wednesday, 12 February)

Smith, Michael K

• Datatypes: XSD notion of minimally conforming processors. (Thursday, 27 February)
• Issues: New issues list available (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Guide: Latest version (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Guide: Question re annotations (Wednesday, 26 February)
• RE: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests (Thursday, 13 February)
• RE: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests (Thursday, 13 February)
• Regrets: 6 Feb Telecon (Tuesday, 4 February)
• RE: Datatype Confusion (Tuesday, 4 February)

Stanton, John

• February 27 Phonecon - Regrets, Stanton (Thursday, 27 February)
• Regrets - Phonecon - Feb 6 (Thursday, 6 February)

Thompson, Lynne R

• Regrets: WOWG: agenda Feb 20 telecon (Thursday, 20 February)

Tim Finin

• forthcoming book "Practical RDF" has chapter on OWL (Thursday, 20 February)

yasser.alsafadi@philips.com

• Regrets for the teleconference 20 Feb (Thursday, 20 February)

Last message date: Friday, 28 February 2003 19:47:09 UTC