- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:56:03 +0100
- To: "Jim Hendler" <hendler@cs.umd.edu>, "webont" <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
> 1 - RDF Compatibility -- Jeremy Carroll, in [1] has proposed > reopening the issue as to what is and is not in OWL Lite -- in > particular with respect to some RDF constructs that were not > included. The decision as to what is in Lite was arrived at over > time and with great effort to reach consensus, and we do not wish to > reopen this issue at this time. (Discussed under issue 5.2, > resolutions at Bristol f2f [2]) > Please clarify how this relates to rdf:XMLLiteral, and please also clarify how any decision that we may still consider whether or not rdf:XMLLiteral is in OWL Lite differs from any decisions whether we may consider whether or not rdfs:isDefinedBy is in OWL Lite, or whether or not the triple rdfs:Bag rdf:type owl:Class . may or may not be in an OWL Lite ontology. Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2003 03:56:14 UTC