- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 15:51:39 -0600
- To: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Excellent detail work... On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 11:08, Sean Bechhofer wrote: > While trying to write a species validator, I've come across the following, > which I think may be errors in the test suite. > > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/miscellaneous/example001.rdf > > uses owl:InverseOf rather than owl:inverseOf. > > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/miscellaneous/example002.rdf > > has an OWL namespace declaration of: > > http://www.w3.org/2002/7/owl > > i.e. "7" rather than "07". OK, I fixed both of those. $Id: example001.rdf,v 1.3 2003/02/12 20:00:39 connolly Exp $ $Id: example002.rdf,v 1.3 2003/02/12 20:01:49 connolly Exp $ Jos, those come from the guide, no? Is there any mechanism for checking that they stay in sync? > In addition, within that file, there are > occurrences of non-OWL vocabulary usage, such as hasClass on a > Restriction. I haven't fixed these... no time just now. > Of course there's nothing wrong with that as it's not in the > OWL namespace :-)). Oh, but there is; those are not OWL Full documents: "An OWL Full document is an RDF/XML document [RDF/XML Syntax], for which the corresponding RDF graph [RDF Concepts] does not use any URI references starting with the prefix http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl# except those found in the [RDF Schema for OWL]." -- http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/snapshot#docConformance > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/maxCardinality/example001.rdf > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/miscellaneous/example001.rdf > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/maxCardinality/example002.rdf > > all use owl:differentIndividalFrom rather than owl:differentFrom. > > Cheers, > > Sean -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 16:52:05 UTC