Re: ISSUE: rdf compatibility from Jeremy Carroll on 2003-02-07 (www-webont-wg@w3.org from February 2003)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 15:29:47 +0000
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <3E43D0EB.5060901@hpl.hp.com>

I propose that the RDF classes Bag, Seq, Alt, List be treated as 
owl:Classes in the abstract syntax for OWL Lite.

I propose that the RDF properties first, rest, be treated as 
owl:FunctionalProperties in the abstract syntax for OWL Lite.

I propose that the RDF properties _1, _2, ... rdfs:member, be treated as 
owl:ObjectPropery's in the abstract syntax for OWL Lite.

I propose that the constant rdf:nil be allowed in OWL Lite and OWL DL as an 
individual.

Jeremy

Received on Friday, 7 February 2003 10:29:55 UTC