- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 09:05:08 -0500 (EST)
- To: seanb@cs.man.ac.uk
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk> Subject: OWL, XML-RDF and Imports Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 16:58:43 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) [...] > An RDF/XML document is an OWL-Full document if it obeys some rules, for > example, to quote a quote in a recent mail from Dan C: > > "An OWL Full document is an RDF/XML document [RDF/XML Syntax], for which > the corresponding RDF graph [RDF Concepts] does not use any URI references > starting with the prefix http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl# except those found > in the [RDF Schema for OWL]." > -- http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/snapshot#docConformance Hmm. This appears to make it be the case that 1/ not all RDF graphs are OWL Full documents and 2/ not all OWL Full documents are OWL DL documents. I believe that the working group has resolved that neither of these should be the case. [...] peter
Received on Sunday, 16 February 2003 09:05:22 UTC