- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:47:09 +0100
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
I have added two tests reflecting the chairs ruling on this issue (and similarly reflecting that ruling filed them under issue 5.2) http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/snapshot#I5.2-010 http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/snapshot#I5.2-011 Out of order comment: These tests indicate that permitting the RDF container vocabulary causes no additional difficulties for OWL Lite reasoners. Moreover, for systems intending to support both RDF and OWL Lite (such as Jena), these tests require mechanisms that switch off RDF container support for OWL Lite. Further, there is an on-going cost of user confusion and user support when users try and migrate RDF files including containers to OWL Lite. Jeremy
Received on Friday, 28 February 2003 04:46:34 UTC