www-tag@w3.org from September 2002 by author

Ann Navarro

• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: About XLink discussion (Thursday, 26 September)

Anthony B. Coates

• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Saturday, 14 September)
• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Thursday, 12 September)
• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Thursday, 12 September)
• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: First public WD of "Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web" (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Re: First public WD of "Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web" (Monday, 2 September)
• Re: First public WD of "Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web" (Monday, 2 September)

Bill de hÓra

• RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Friday, 20 September)
• RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc [RDF info] (Friday, 20 September)
• RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Friday, 20 September)
• RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Friday, 20 September)
• RE: Micropayments and principle 4 (Monday, 9 September)

Brian E Carpenter

• Comments on Architectural Principles draft (Monday, 9 September)

Brian McBride

• Re: RDF Concepts and Data Model document (Saturday, 28 September)
• Re: RDF Concepts and Data Model document (Thursday, 19 September)

Bullard, Claude L (Len)

• RE: Is XHTML a dead end? (Thursday, 26 September)
• RE: More research on resources, think it's all here (Friday, 20 September)
• RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc [RDF info] (Friday, 20 September)
• RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Thursday, 19 September)
• RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Thursday, 19 September)
• RE: How to Version XML Applications (Friday, 13 September)
• RE: How to Version XML Applications (Friday, 13 September)
• RE: How to Version XML Applications (Wednesday, 11 September)
• RE: How to Version XML Applications (Wednesday, 11 September)
• RE: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: URI denumerability (Wednesday, 4 September)
• RE: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? (Wednesday, 4 September)
• RE: Architectural issue: component specifications (was More on xl ink- 23) (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: URI denumerability (Tuesday, 3 September)

Champion, Mike

• RE: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)

Chris Lilley

• Re: draft-wilde-text-fragment-01 (was: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' ...) (Thursday, 12 September)
• Re: draft-wilde-text-fragment-01 (was: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' ...) (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: Proposed changes to Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Proposed changes to Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use (Thursday, 5 September)

Dan Connolly

• RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: [Minutes] 30 Aug 2002 TAG teleconf (arch doc, xlinkScope-23, deepLinking-25, uriMediaType-9, URIEquivalence-15) (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: Architecture or process? (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: Micropayments and principle 4 (retrieval is safe) (Monday, 9 September)
• my web, your web, The Web (Friday, 6 September)
• URIEquivalence-15: Identifier Scope and Resource Identity (Friday, 6 September)
• "absolute URI reference" considered awkward (and in one case, overly constraining) (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: suggested replacement text "circle or spline" (Wednesday, 4 September)

Dan Kohn

• RE: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? (Thursday, 5 September)

Daniel Dardailler

• Some comments on WD-webarch-20020830 (Monday, 30 September)

Danny Ayers

• RE: First public WD of "Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web" (Sunday, 1 September)

Dare Obasanjo

• RE: Is XHTML a dead end? (Friday, 27 September)
• RE: XLink+HLink is one story not two (Friday, 27 September)
• RE: How to Version XML Applications (Friday, 13 September)
• RE: How to Version XML Applications (Wednesday, 11 September)
• RE: How to Version XML Applications (Wednesday, 11 September)
• RE: How to Version XML Applications (Wednesday, 11 September)

David Carlisle

• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)

David Hopwood

• draft-wilde-text-fragment-01 (was: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' ...) (Thursday, 5 September)

David Orchard

• RE: two failings of XLink (Saturday, 28 September)
• RE: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Thursday, 19 September)
• RE: Comments on Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: How to Version XML Applications (Thursday, 12 September)

Didier PH Martin

• RE: A modest hyperlinking proposal (Monday, 30 September)
• RE: two failings of XLink (Monday, 30 September)
• RE: Hlink, CSS anyone? (Saturday, 28 September)
• RE: Hlink, CSS anyone? (Saturday, 28 September)
• RE: two failings of XLink (Saturday, 28 September)
• RE: Hlink, CSS anyone? (Saturday, 28 September)
• RE: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• RE: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• RE: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• RE: Is XHTML a dead end? (Friday, 27 September)
• RE: Is XHTML a dead end? (Friday, 27 September)
• RE: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• RE: Is XHTML a dead end? (Thursday, 26 September)
• RE: two failings of XLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• RE: Suggested alternate wording re XLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• RE: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• RE: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• RE: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• RE: TAG feedback on Namespaces 1.1 Last Call (Thursday, 26 September)
• RE: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)

DPawson@rnib.org.uk

• RE: Call for Review: XML-Signature XPath Filter 2.0 (Tuesday, 3 September)

Elliotte Rusty Harold

• Re: two failings of XLink (Saturday, 28 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Micropayments and principle 4 (retrieval is safe) (Tuesday, 10 September)
• Is SMTP really part of the Web Architecture? (Monday, 9 September)
• Micropayments and principle 4 (Monday, 9 September)

Eric van der Vlist

• RE: Hlink, CSS anyone? (Saturday, 28 September)
• RE: Hlink, CSS anyone? (Saturday, 28 September)
• Re: Is XHTML a dead end? (Saturday, 28 September)
• Hlink, CSS anyone? (Saturday, 28 September)
• Re: Is XHTML a dead end? (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: Is XHTML a dead end? (Friday, 27 September)
• RE: Is XHTML a dead end? (Friday, 27 September)
• RE: Is XHTML a dead end? (Friday, 27 September)
• RE: Is XHTML a dead end? (Friday, 27 September)
• RE: Is XHTML a dead end? (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: XLink: the architectural issue (Friday, 27 September)

Erik Wilde

• Re: draft-wilde-text-fragment-01 (was: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' ...) (Wednesday, 18 September)

Etan Wexler

• Social problems and technical fixes (Thursday, 5 September)

Graham Klyne

• Comments on 20020830 architecture document... (Wednesday, 25 September)
• RDF concepts, section 2.4.2 (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: RDF Concepts and Data Model document (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: "absolute URI reference" considered awkward (and in one case, overly constraining) (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Architecture or process? (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: Comments on Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: [Minutes] 30 Aug 2002 TAG teleconf (arch doc, xlinkScope-23, deepLinking-25, uriMediaType-9, URIEquivalence-15) (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: suggested replacement text "circle or spline" (Wednesday, 11 September)

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

• FW: Danish case on deep linking (Wednesday, 25 September)

Ian B. Jacobs

• Re: Minutes (was Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink) (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: About XLink discussion (Thursday, 26 September)
• [Agenda] 24-25 Sep TAG face-to-face meeting agenda (Thursday, 19 September)
• Summary of TAG activity from 7 August to 3 Sep 2002 (Thursday, 5 September)
• [Agenda] 9 September TAG teleconf (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Proposed changes to Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use (Wednesday, 4 September)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• Re: Micropayments and principle 4 (retrieval is safe) (Wednesday, 11 September)

Jeni Tennison

• Re: A modest hyperlinking proposal (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: Links are links (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: FW: A modest hyperlinking proposal (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: Hlink, CSS anyone? (Saturday, 28 September)
• Re: Hlink, CSS anyone? (Saturday, 28 September)
• Re: Hlink, CSS anyone? (Saturday, 28 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Saturday, 28 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: generic uselessness (was Re: two failings of XLink) (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)

Jonathan Borden

• Re: RDF Concepts and Data Model document (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: RDF Concepts and Data Model document (Sunday, 22 September)
• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc [RDF info] (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: More research on resources, think it's all here (Friday, 20 September)
• expansion on: Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: Micropayments and principle 4 (retrieval is safe) (Wednesday, 11 September)

Jos De_Roo

• Re: my web, your web, The Web (Friday, 6 September)

Joseph Reagle

• How to Version XML Applications (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: Comments on Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web (Monday, 9 September)
• Comments on Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Re: Proposed changes to Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use (Wednesday, 4 September)

Julian Reschke

• RE: URI denumerability (Wednesday, 4 September)
• RE: archdoc, section 2 (Monday, 2 September)
• archdoc, section 2 (Sunday, 1 September)

Larry Masinter

• Re: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? (Sunday, 8 September)
• defining 'URI' (Sunday, 8 September)
• Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? (Wednesday, 4 September)

Mark Baker

• Hypertext; for machine or humans? (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: Micropayments and principle 4 (retrieval is safe) (Monday, 9 September)
• Re: Is SMTP really part of the Web Architecture? (Monday, 9 September)
• Re: "absolute URI reference" considered awkward (and in one case, overly constraining) (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: working draft on architectural principles (Tuesday, 3 September)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: Is SMTP really part of the Web Architecture? (Monday, 9 September)
• Re: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Re: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? (Wednesday, 4 September)

Masayasu Ishikawa

• Re: Some questions on HLink (Tuesday, 17 September)

Matthew Wilson

• RE: URI denumerability (Wednesday, 4 September)

Micah Dubinko

• RE: A modest hyperlinking proposal (Monday, 30 September)
• FW: A modest hyperlinking proposal (Monday, 30 September)
• RE: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Concrete Hyperlinking Suggestion (was: Suggested alternate wordin g re XLink) (Thursday, 26 September)

Michael Mealling

• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Thursday, 19 September)

Mike Champion

• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: Is XHTML a dead end? (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Suggested alternate wording re XLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)

Miles Sabin

• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Friday, 20 September)

Misha.Wolf@reuters.com

• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)

MURATA Makoto

• Re: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' in MIME media type registration? (Saturday, 7 September)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• Re: RDF Concepts and Data Model document (Tuesday, 24 September)
• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Friday, 13 September)
• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Friday, 13 September)
• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Thursday, 12 September)
• Re: Micropayments and principle 4 (retrieval is safe) (Monday, 9 September)

Norman Walsh

• Re: Hlink, CSS anyone? (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: Hypertext; for machine or humans? (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Sunday, 29 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: XLink: the architectural issue (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Friday, 27 September)
• TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Monday, 16 September)
• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Friday, 13 September)
• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Friday, 13 September)
• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Friday, 13 September)
• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Friday, 13 September)
• Re: Announcing HLink: rationale (Friday, 13 September)
• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Wednesday, 11 September)
• [Minutes] 09 Sep 2002 TAG teleconf (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: Comments on Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web (Wednesday, 11 September)

Paul Cotton

• Action PC 2002/09/09 (Friday, 13 September)
• RE: draft-wilde-text-fragment-01 (was: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' ...) (Friday, 6 September)
• RE: Proposed changes to Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use (Thursday, 5 September)

Paul Grosso

• Re: two failings of XLink (Saturday, 28 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: Announcing HLink: rationale (Friday, 13 September)

Paul Prescod

• Re: Links are links (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Lessons from the RSS and HLink wars (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Saturday, 28 September)
• Links are links (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• URIs and web services (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: Is SMTP really part of the Web Architecture? (Tuesday, 10 September)
• Re: First public WD of "Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web" (Tuesday, 3 September)

pele

• work from home we will help you. (Sunday, 8 September)

Robin Berjon

• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: Links are links (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: "absolute URI reference" considered awkward (and in one case, overly constraining) (Saturday, 7 September)

Shane McCarron

• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)

Simon St.Laurent

• Re: Lessons from the RSS and HLink wars (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: Hlink, CSS anyone? (Monday, 30 September)
• generic uselessness (was Re: two failings of XLink) (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Minutes (was Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink) (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Sections (was Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink) (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Sections (was Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink) (Thursday, 26 September)
• two failings of XLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• remapping (was Re: Announcing HLink: rationale) (Saturday, 14 September)

Stefan Eissing

• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Monday, 23 September)

Steven Pemberton

• Re: XLink+HLink is one story not two (Friday, 27 September)
• XLink+HLink is one story not two (Friday, 27 September)
• XLink: the architectural issue (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Is XHTML a dead end? (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Some questions on HLink (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: Announcing HLink: rationale (Friday, 13 September)
• Announcing HLink: rationale (Friday, 13 September)

Svgdeveloper@aol.com

• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Is XHTML a dead end? (Thursday, 26 September)
• Is XHTML a dead end? (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: Sections (was Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink) (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Thursday, 26 September)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Tuesday, 24 September)
• Re: RDF Concepts and Data Model document (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: RDF Concepts and Data Model document (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: "absolute URI reference" considered awkward (and in one case, overly constraining) (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: Comments on Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: "absolute URI reference" considered awkward (and in one case, overly constraining) (Friday, 6 September)

Tim Bray

• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: Is XHTML a dead end? (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: Is XHTML a dead end? (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: Is XHTML a dead end? (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: two failings of XLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink (Friday, 27 September)
• Suggested alternate wording re XLink (Thursday, 26 September)
• About XLink discussion (Thursday, 26 September)
• TAG feedback on Namespaces 1.1 Last Call (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: RDF Concepts and Data Model document (Friday, 20 September)
• More research on resources, think it's all here (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc [RDF info] (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Thursday, 19 September)
• My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Thursday, 19 September)
• Lightly-edited IRC log of TAG Sep 16 telecon (Monday, 16 September)
• Some questions on HLink (Monday, 16 September)
• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Monday, 16 September)
• Re: Announcing HLink: rationale (Saturday, 14 September)
• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: How to Version XML Applications (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: Micropayments and principle 4 (Monday, 9 September)
• Re: "absolute URI reference" considered awkward (and in one case, overly constraining) (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: "absolute URI reference" considered awkward (and in one case, overly constraining) (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: "absolute URI reference" considered awkward (and in one case, overly constraining) (Friday, 6 September)
• Deep Linking draft (Monday, 2 September)
• Re: archdoc, section 2 (Sunday, 1 September)
• Re: suggested replacement text "circle or spline" (Sunday, 1 September)
• Re: Using URIs as language instead of as protocol element (Sunday, 1 September)
• Re: working draft on architectural principles (Sunday, 1 September)

Williams, Stuart

• RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Friday, 20 September)
• RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Friday, 20 September)
• RE: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc (Friday, 20 September)
• [Agenda] 16 September TAG teleconf (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: "absolute URI reference" considered awkward (and in one case, overly constraining) (Monday, 9 September)
• RE: First public WD of "Architectural Principles of the World Wid e Web" (Tuesday, 3 September)

Last message date: Monday, 30 September 2002 21:52:24 UTC