- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:39:24 -0400
- To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- cc: www-tag@w3.org
Elliotte writes: > I'm not sure we're asking the same question. That may be why we're > getting different answers. :-) I think we're asking it for different purposes. > I'm counting it as one img element *and* as 11 elements total. > However, if you take away any of those ten child elements or their > content you have changed the one img element. Sure. But to me the need for the 10 child elements in that case is unfortunate, and telling me that it's so simple because it's just one element is misleading at best. >From my perspective, XLink creates an enormous mess with lots of parts. From your perspective, it creates a clean tree. I don't think either of us will budge any time soon. ------------- Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA http://simonstl.com may be my URI http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether
Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 10:39:27 UTC