Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink

Svgdeveloper@aol.com wrote:
> Not even if the paragraphs are structurally unlinked to any assumed header?
> 
> There is nothing structurally in XHTML to associate the h1 element with 
> its (probably) associated p element.
> 
> Surely that is one of the structural defects of HTML that should at 
> least be looked at in XHTML 2.0?

Is there anything specific that prevents you from reading the current 
XHTML 2.0 draft? Say for instance:

   http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/mod-text.html#sec_8.18.

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Research Engineer, Expway
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488

Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 12:53:57 UTC