W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2002

Re: two failings of XLink

From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 23:19:53 +0100
Message-ID: <164112431808.20020927231953@jenitennison.com>
To: www-tag@w3.org, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>


> I don't think I was complaining about anything. I believe I replied
> to Jeni that I didn't think the <object> tag above was a hypertext
> reference and consequently that there was no motivation to express
> it in XLink.

So can you describe more formally what you class as a hypertext
reference as opposed to a URI that is not a hypertext reference?

I guess that I've been assuming that any URI that points to a resource
that should be retrieved/accessed/navigated to (as opposed to one that
is being used as an identifier or as a base URI for example)
represents a hyperlink.

But ruling out things like classids and usemap attributes and so on
would certainly make life a lot simpler for XHTML and other languages,
and support the decision not to use XLink in, for example, XForms to
point to instance/submission URIs.



Jeni Tennison
Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 18:27:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:54 UTC