W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2002

Is XHTML a dead end?

From: <Svgdeveloper@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:47:57 EDT
Message-ID: <17b.f4450d1.2ac4cc7d@aol.com>
To: mc@xegesis.org, www-tag@w3.org
In a message dated 26/09/2002 20:09:58 GMT Daylight Time, mc@xegesis.org 

> In my humble and personal opinion, given that the world has not rushed to 
> implement
> XLink nor is it clamoring for XHTML 2, there's time to step back, 
> reconsider
> all assumptions, and maybe get both right next time.  


Perhaps you didn't quite mean *all* assumptions. :)

A perfectly genuine question in my mind is whether XHTML is and will continue 
to be a dead end.

I could make this a very lengthy post but I think the bald question, "Is 
XHTML worth persevering worth?" encapsulates the questioning of a perhaps 
dearly held assumption. It's an assumption worth examining in detail in my 

Andrew Watt
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 16:49:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:54 UTC