- From: <Svgdeveloper@aol.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:47:57 EDT
- To: mc@xegesis.org, www-tag@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 16:49:00 UTC
In a message dated 26/09/2002 20:09:58 GMT Daylight Time, mc@xegesis.org writes: > In my humble and personal opinion, given that the world has not rushed to > implement > XLink nor is it clamoring for XHTML 2, there's time to step back, > reconsider > all assumptions, and maybe get both right next time. Mike, Perhaps you didn't quite mean *all* assumptions. :) A perfectly genuine question in my mind is whether XHTML is and will continue to be a dead end. I could make this a very lengthy post but I think the bald question, "Is XHTML worth persevering worth?" encapsulates the questioning of a perhaps dearly held assumption. It's an assumption worth examining in detail in my view. Andrew Watt
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 16:49:00 UTC